This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc trunk vs python

From: Michael Veksler <mveksler at techunix dot technion dot ac dot il>
To: Guido van Rossum <guido at python dot org>
Cc: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Michael Veksler <mveksler at techunix dot technion dot ac dot il>, Jack Howarth <howarth at bromo dot msbb dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 27 Aug 2006 20:25:46 +0300
Subject: Re: gcc trunk vs python
References: <20060826222747.5FD6C110019@bromo.msbb.uc.edu> <44F12244.7010901@tx.technion.ac.il> <ca471dc20608270840r552826bdge5b5fddf263e25d@mail.gmail.com> <m3odu6go4k.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <ca471dc20608270928h3d1a6d77h6048914542c62427@mail.gmail.com>

Guido van Rossum wrote:

It has calmed me down. But I hope that the future quality of the
arguments defending the feature is better than Michael Veksler's
attempt. Thanks for responding in person.


Sorry, next time I'll find a better example. Gosh, who would think
that a benign example,  would stir such emotions.

References:
- Re: gcc trunk vs python
  - From: Jack Howarth
- Re: gcc trunk vs python
  - From: Michael Veksler
- Re: gcc trunk vs python
  - From: Guido van Rossum
- Re: gcc trunk vs python
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gcc trunk vs python
  - From: Guido van Rossum

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]