Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?

[DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>]

> Good!  In that case, you don't need them to be pointers at all. :-)
> 
> I think you should just declare them as integer types.

That makes initializing function pointers messy.

Besides, they're not integers.  They're pointers.  I'd *like* to be
able to dereference them in some simple ways in the future; telling me
to "just use integers" is a step backwards.  Why don't I "just use
assembler" or "just use C"?  that defeats the whole purpose of having
a high level language.