This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
> Good! In that case, you don't need them to be pointers at all. :-)
>
> I think you should just declare them as integer types.
That makes initializing function pointers messy.
Besides, they're not integers. They're pointers. I'd *like* to be
able to dereference them in some simple ways in the future; telling me
to "just use integers" is a step backwards. Why don't I "just use
assembler" or "just use C"? that defeats the whole purpose of having
a high level language.
- References:
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?
- Re: does gcc support multiple sizes, or not?