This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

AW: [g++] RFH: Is there a way to make gcc place global const class objects in .rodata ?


> >>>>> Haase Bjoern (PT-BEU/EMT) writes:
>
> Haase> Meanwhile, I have reduced a test case for the issue. It's 6
lines long.
>
> Haase> #include <complex>
>
> Haase> using namespace std;
> Haase> const complex<double> should_be_in_rodata (42,-42);
> Haase> complex<double> should_be_in_data (-42,42);
> Haase> complex<double> should_be_in_bss;
>
>
> Haase> Presently all of them end up in bss.

>	Has this been opened as a GCC Bugzilla PR?  I believe that this
is
> a regression.
>
>David

Yes, this is 

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131

Bjoern. 


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]