This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
[OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
- From: Devang Patel <devang dot patel at gmail dot com>
- To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 12:28:36 -0700
- Subject: [OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
- References: <200607311859.k6VIx2iw030799@earth.phy.uc.edu>
[off-topic]
Andrew Pinski wrote:
Dan Berlin created patch queue so that we do not have to ping patches.
Actually it was created for a different reason.
>> From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
>> To: gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org
>> Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:18:39 -0400 (EDT)
>> Subject: patch ping
>> I thought that I would not have to ping patches any more
>> with the patch queue but ....
:)
So, initially you understood it same way.
Did someone clarify you the original purpose of patch queue or did you
jump to conclusion because patch queue keeps getting longer ?
-
Devang