This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Jan Hubicka <hubicka at ucw dot cz>
Cc: Denis Vlasenko <vda dot linux at googlemail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Fri, 28 Jul 2006 10:24:35 -0400
Subject: Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
References: <200607271256.14606.vda.linux@googlemail.com> <20060727134442.GA16127@nevyn.them.org> <20060728094412.GA14957@atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>

On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:44:12AM +0200, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> Interesting, the major reason for disabling -m64 by default for 32bit
> compilers was the fact that it enforces HOST_WIDE_INT to be 64bit
> slowing down the whole compiler considerably.  Are Debian's folks happy
> to wait longer for compilation or has this overhead changed?

They haven't done any measuring I know of, but we needed 64-bit
compilers for a variety of reasons and this was much less disruptive
than packaging a second copy of GCC.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
  - From: Denis Vlasenko
- Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
  - From: Jan Hubicka

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]