This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

From: "Laurynas Biveinis" <laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com>
To: "Basile STARYNKEVITCH" <basile at starynkevitch dot net>
Cc: "GCC Mailing List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jul 2006 20:39:29 +0300
Subject: Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
References: <d1e3ff2b0607240145h1558bc59h61a6250150b14fd7@mail.gmail.com> <934f64a20607251030w2cb1ef46xddca7daf46cc905d@mail.gmail.com> <20060725193130.GA6778@ours.starynkevitch.net>

2006/7/25, Basile STARYNKEVITCH <basile@starynkevitch.net>:

A theoritical alternative might be to use a precise copying collector
like Qish.  http://starynkevitch.net/Basile/qishintro.html In
practice, this would be impractical (even if the GTY marker could
help) because it requires changing a lot of code.


Precise copying collector is certainly a viable idea, there have
already been some experiments with GCC, see
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-03/msg01266.html .

--
Laurynas

References:
- [boehms-gc] Performance results
  - From: Laurynas Biveinis
- Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
  - From: David Nicol
- Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
  - From: Basile STARYNKEVITCH

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]