This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?

From: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu (Richard Kenner)
To: mark at codesourcery dot com
Cc: dnovillo at redhat dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, joern dot rennecke at st dot com, richard dot guenther at gmail dot com
Date: Sat, 15 Jul 2006 00:17:21 EDT
Subject: Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
References: <44B51DB9.6060701@st.com> <84fc9c000607121034s55b38c35n463bf108794636da@mail.gmail.com> <10607121833.AA28268@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <44B545A7.6040906@redhat.com> <44B831D6.6090802@codesourcery.com> <10607150400.AA03302@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <44B868BB.30101@codesourcery.com> <10607150405.AA03433@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <44B86B17.5010705@codesourcery.com>

> OK.  But, GIMPLE is also supposed to be type-safe, so I wouldn't think
> that "int = long" would be well-formed gimple.

I thought that "type safe" meant *compatible* types ...

References:
- RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Joern RENNECKE
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]