This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: why are we not using const?
- From: Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>
- To: "Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi at caipclassic dot rutgers dot edu>
- Cc: gdr at integrable-solutions dot net, gcc at gnu dot org, lopezibanez at gmail dot com, pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu
- Date: 14 Jul 2006 10:30:11 -0700
- Subject: Re: why are we not using const?
- References: <6c33472e0606270551i1d5abe04j9d6c9839219539e8@mail.gmail.com> <m3bqseprw2.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <22A52D62-0078-4140-A944-55C31E1810A7@physics.uc.edu> <200606282314.k5SNEPgw005651@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> <m33bdotru5.fsf@uniton.integrable-solutions.net> <200607141721.k6EHLaEv008524@caipclassic.rutgers.edu>
"Kaveh R. Ghazi" <ghazi@caipclassic.rutgers.edu> writes:
> #define TREE_CHECK(T, CODE) __extension__ \
> ({ const_tree const __t = (T); \
How about
typeof(T) const __t = (T);
?
Ian