This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
- From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>
- To: Yuri Pudgorodsky <yur at ptci dot ru>
- Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>
- Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2006 16:55:07 +0200
- Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
- References: <44AA67AE.4070509@ptci.ru> <m3zmfocfb1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <44ABCE62.7090806@ptci.ru>
> What do we do if compiler ICE generating code for valid C syntax with
> defined behavior? Fix it!
> Why should we go another way for valid C syntax with undefined behavior?
The answer is in the question, no?
--
Eric Botcazou