This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: Yuri Pudgorodsky <yur at ptci dot ru>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Ian Lance Taylor <iant at google dot com>, Andrew Haley <aph at redhat dot com>, ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr
Date: Tue, 4 Jul 2006 17:18:24 -0700
Subject: Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
References: <44AA67AE.4070509@ptci.ru> <m3lkr9e1h1.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <17578.43651.892156.272070@zebedee.pink> <m3d5cldsl8.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <44AB02BB.2030205@ptci.ru>

On Jul 4, 2006, at 5:07 PM, Yuri Pudgorodsky wrote:

Can someone make the decision to reopen PR optimization/12085?


And I posted a patch to do the same in Objective-C mode as C mode :).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-08/msg01013.html

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Andrew Haley
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
  - From: Yuri Pudgorodsky

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]