gcc archive
author index for July, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)

François-Xavier Coudert

• 2006-07-28 09:45 GCC missed optimization?

Roar Thronæs

• 2006-07-22 08:06 gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend.
• 2006-07-23 08:44 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend.

Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez

• 2006-07-06 21:54 coercion warnings for NULL in C front end
• 2006-07-09 18:43 [PATCH] (request for comments) Wcoercion in g++
• 2006-07-10 23:23 [PATCH] Wcoercion: removed overflow check
• 2006-07-13 10:24 Re: Wiki down for a few days

Rafael EspÃndola

• 2006-07-14 00:41 [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in
• 2006-07-16 01:23 [lto] factor code common to all builtin_function
• 2006-07-17 11:22 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-23 01:55 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in
• 2006-07-24 20:30 why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-25 12:00 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-25 13:52 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-25 16:43 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?

Abid Ghufran

• 2006-07-19 13:49 using threads with gcc on fedora (undefined reference to pthread_create)
• 2006-07-23 07:50 send a structure containing a pointer to another structure, over socket stream

Alfred M. Szmidt

• 2006-07-15 15:49 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices
• 2006-07-15 15:53 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices

ammalik

• 2006-07-12 01:52 Need help

Andi Kleen

• 2006-07-29 19:06 Re: Patch: Support IA-64 speculation [4/5]

Andreas Krebbel

• 2006-07-21 14:53 Fortran fail on 4.0 branch

Andreas Schwab

• 2006-07-11 08:47 Re: Someone broke darwin?
• 2006-07-24 14:40 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-25 12:25 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?

Andrew de Quincey

• 2006-07-26 22:54 Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0
• 2006-07-27 01:30 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0

Andrew Haley

• 2006-07-01 18:52 Re: void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch?
• 2006-07-04 17:51 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 09:40 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 14:46 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 16:00 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 17:54 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-06 10:58 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 09:34 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 14:39 Re: In which library is __register_frame_info defined??
• 2006-07-11 11:23 Re: Questions regarding __register_frame_info
• 2006-07-13 14:58 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-13 15:52 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-19 10:11 Re: JIT exception handling
• 2006-07-25 09:37 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-25 12:52 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?

Andrew Pinski

• 2006-07-02 15:59 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 19:44 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 21:13 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-05 00:18 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 03:46 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 09:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 16:11 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-10 21:33 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc)
• 2006-07-11 11:56 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
• 2006-07-12 08:06 Question about vec_extract
• 2006-07-12 11:45 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 01:03 Re: Question about vec_extract
• 2006-07-13 07:27 BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-13 12:36 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-13 13:08 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-14 00:47 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in
• 2006-07-14 02:50 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-14 14:13 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node
• 2006-07-15 04:18 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 10:02 Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-15 15:35 config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices
• 2006-07-15 15:54 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices
• 2006-07-16 07:16 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-16 08:20 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-16 15:12 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-16 15:20 Re: where is the gcc wiki?
• 2006-07-22 08:28 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend.
• 2006-07-22 14:44 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:05 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:27 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:40 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:53 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 19:03 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-24 08:50 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-24 13:29 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-24 22:07 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals
• 2006-07-26 22:36 Re: New testsuite failures with -fprofile-use
• 2006-07-27 03:41 Re: gcc-4.3 projects page?
• 2006-07-28 10:47 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-28 10:48 Re: GCC missed optimization?
• 2006-07-28 11:02 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-28 14:22 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-31 19:03 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
• 2006-07-31 20:39 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?

Arnaud Charlet

• 2006-07-03 09:51 problem with your change in configure/configure.in with Ada
• 2006-07-19 12:12 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in

Atsushi Nemoto

• 2006-07-13 16:31 gcc 4.x can not optimize access for array well
• 2006-07-21 16:52 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-22 12:40 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-24 14:34 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-25 13:18 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering

Basile STARYNKEVITCH

• 2006-07-25 19:31 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

Ben Elliston

• 2006-07-10 11:06 Re: Switch statement optimization

Benjamin Kosnik

• 2006-07-10 22:52 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory
• 2006-07-11 17:58 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
• 2006-07-12 17:20 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4

Benjamin Smedberg

• 2006-07-12 21:24 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-17 15:25 Re: gcc visibility used by moz

bluecoder

• 2006-07-14 23:23 gcc inline assembly on x86 platform

Bobby

• 2006-07-16 19:31 Re: where is the gcc wiki?

Bridge Wu

• 2006-07-03 01:10 SP must be 8 byte aligned on entry to AAPCS-conforming functions

Carlos O'Donell

• 2006-07-14 20:20 Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-17 16:32 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-17 22:17 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin

Christian Hildner

• 2006-07-10 09:39 Switch statement optimization
• 2006-07-11 10:03 Re: Switch statement optimization

Christian Wagner

• 2006-07-25 12:00 How to extract internal tree structure information?
• 2006-07-26 07:50 Re: How to extract internal tree structure information?

Christopher Faylor

• 2006-07-01 15:56 Re: Notes of the libgcc-math BOF at the summit.

Crystal Engel

• 2006-07-28 04:03 Fwd: ..

Dale Johannesen

• 2006-07-30 00:25 Re: if() and trailing ;

Dan Kegel

• 2006-07-27 02:27 gcc-4.3 projects page?

Daniel Berlin

• 2006-07-05 15:50 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-11 19:53 Re: [lto] libelf header
• 2006-07-12 18:51 Wiki down for a few days
• 2006-07-13 15:23 Re: Wiki down for a few days
• 2006-07-14 16:42 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node
• 2006-07-16 19:29 Re: where is the gcc wiki?
• 2006-07-17 15:36 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-18 14:16 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass
• 2006-07-18 17:06 Re: website
• 2006-07-25 01:57 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure
• 2006-07-25 11:43 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-25 21:55 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure

Daniel Franke

• 2006-07-04 07:59 request of copyright assignment form

Daniel Jacobowitz

• 2006-07-05 15:54 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-05 16:19 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-10 20:38 Re: gcc breakage
• 2006-07-10 22:20 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory
• 2006-07-12 02:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:01 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 14:53 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code?
• 2006-07-13 15:11 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-13 15:12 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code?
• 2006-07-13 18:27 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-14 00:50 Re: [PATCH] Install drivers from gcc/Makefile.in
• 2006-07-19 13:50 Re: using threads with gcc on fedora (undefined reference to pthread_create)
• 2006-07-22 17:08 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-23 18:54 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-27 13:44 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-27 14:02 Re: building cross-compiler to x86_64. pthread.h: No such file
• 2006-07-28 14:24 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!

Daniel S. Wilkerson

• 2006-07-18 21:38 Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1.

Danny Backx

• 2006-07-24 17:30 cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++
• 2006-07-24 19:03 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++
• 2006-07-24 19:17 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++
• 2006-07-25 06:51 [Fwd: C++ cross-devel from Linux : success]

Danny Smith

• 2006-07-23 21:15 RE: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 23:00 [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT
• 2006-07-28 02:06 RE: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT

Dave Korn

• 2006-07-02 12:00 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-05 16:23 RE: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 18:26 RE: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?
• 2006-07-11 16:18 RE: How to deal with 1.#IND?
• 2006-07-14 17:30 RE: why are we not using const?
• 2006-07-20 11:05 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-20 15:58 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-24 18:34 RE: cross gcc - working gcc, but cannot compile C++
• 2006-07-25 16:05 RE: Little help in understanding expmed.c::choose_multiplier()

David A. Braun

• 2006-07-18 16:35 website

David Brownell

• 2006-07-10 19:49 ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc)
• 2006-07-11 01:58 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc)

David Daney

• 2006-07-17 17:02 Re: Importing boehm-gc 6.7?

David Edelsohn

• 2006-07-02 22:56 Ulrich Weigand appointed reload maintainer
• 2006-07-11 13:27 Re: Someone broke darwin?
• 2006-07-12 17:27 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
• 2006-07-24 14:38 Re: Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX
• 2006-07-28 15:46 Re: _LARGE_FILES support in AIX -GCC compilation problem.

David Nicol

• 2006-07-25 17:30 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

DebianTux23

• 2006-07-13 15:08 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links

Denis Chertykov

• 2006-07-12 16:37 AVR port have a problem with reload

Denis Vlasenko

• 2006-07-25 15:26 Little help in understanding expmed.c::choose_multiplier()
• 2006-07-27 10:56 sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-27 13:52 building cross-compiler to x86_64. pthread.h: No such file
• 2006-07-28 09:35 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-30 13:14 [PATCH] improved algorithm for gcc/expmed.c::choose_multiplier()

Devang Patel

• 2006-07-31 17:49 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
• 2006-07-31 17:55 Re: GCC missed optimization?
• 2006-07-31 19:28 [OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?

Diego Novillo

• 2006-07-12 18:55 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-13 12:32 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-13 13:06 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-13 16:19 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-18 11:35 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass
• 2006-07-26 19:48 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure
• 2006-07-26 19:51 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure

DJ Delorie

• 2006-07-23 23:37 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.

Dorit Nuzman

• 2006-07-29 17:27 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
• 2006-07-29 17:36 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
• 2006-07-29 17:45 Re: GCC missed optimization?

Dr. Eugene Osaseen

• 2006-07-30 09:40 Review

Duncan Sands

• 2006-07-27 14:32 New Ada testcases

elcicala

• 2006-07-13 23:33 campionati mondiale per stragi - la classifica

Elmar Krieger

• 2006-07-01 17:43 void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch?

Erdem Guven

• 2006-07-20 10:31 8086 backend and stack problem

Eric Botcazou

• 2006-07-04 17:38 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-04 21:47 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 03:30 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 04:10 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 14:50 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 17:06 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 21:28 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-11 05:31 Re: [PATCH] Wcoercion: removed overflow check
• 2006-07-11 13:46 Re: Someone broke darwin?
• 2006-07-15 14:54 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin

Eric Christopher

• 2006-07-01 07:14 Re: explaination of some gcc functions
• 2006-07-27 01:37 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0

Eric Weddington

• 2006-07-24 22:29 RE: Searching configured and relocated prefix.

Erven ROHOU

• 2006-07-04 09:43 Re: Source code of CIL back-end

Evandro Menezes

• 2006-07-05 20:46 Notes from the BOF on DFP on x86/x86-64 at the GCC Summit

Falk Hueffner

• 2006-07-15 09:12 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect"
• 2006-07-15 09:29 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect"

Fariborz Jahanian

• 2006-07-24 22:03 Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals
• 2006-07-24 22:10 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals
• 2006-07-24 22:19 Re: Use of compound_literal_expr in c vs target_expr in c++ for compound literals

Florian Weimer

• 2006-07-09 17:41 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-15 13:39 Re: expand_divmod algorithm patented?

Fredrik Johansson

• 2006-07-17 14:24 Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does
• 2006-07-21 11:40 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does

FX Coudert

• 2006-07-06 20:49 GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code?

Gabriel Dos Reis

• 2006-07-05 09:58 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 12:20 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 22:44 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 22:47 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-06 10:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-06 23:25 Re: coercion warnings for NULL in C front end
• 2006-07-07 12:32 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 14:59 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-11 19:43 [lto] libelf header
• 2006-07-11 20:30 Re: [lto] libelf header
• 2006-07-11 23:42 Re: [lto] libelf header
• 2006-07-12 19:09 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:09 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 21:27 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 21:31 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 22:07 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 22:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 12:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 20:31 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 20:41 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 20:47 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 20:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:21 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:24 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 22:32 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 22:52 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 23:04 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-23 23:30 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-24 23:02 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?

Gary Funck

• 2006-07-01 18:23 externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-01 21:09 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 19:23 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 20:58 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 21:55 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-03 15:30 RE: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-03 22:28 RE: externs and thread local storage

gccadmin

• 2006-07-01 17:54 gcc-4.2-20060701 is now available
• 2006-07-06 22:42 gcc-4.0-20060706 is now available
• 2006-07-07 22:41 gcc-4.1-20060707 is now available
• 2006-07-08 17:57 gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available
• 2006-07-13 22:42 gcc-4.0-20060713 is now available
• 2006-07-14 22:41 gcc-4.1-20060714 is now available
• 2006-07-15 17:54 gcc-4.2-20060715 is now available
• 2006-07-20 22:40 gcc-4.0-20060720 is now available
• 2006-07-21 22:41 gcc-4.1-20060721 is now available
• 2006-07-22 17:53 gcc-4.2-20060722 is now available
• 2006-07-27 22:42 gcc-4.0-20060727 is now available
• 2006-07-28 22:43 gcc-4.1-20060728 is now available
• 2006-07-29 17:54 gcc-4.2-20060729 is now available

Geoffrey Keating

• 2006-07-14 18:17 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:18 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:29 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:34 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:49 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-27 22:33 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-27 22:37 Re: ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library

Gerald Pfeifer

• 2006-07-01 13:42 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean? (was: What happened to bubblestrap?)
• 2006-07-02 15:20 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean?
• 2006-07-07 20:38 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-08 00:33 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-11 11:52 New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
• 2006-07-31 22:55 Rainer Orth appointed IRIX and Tru64 UNIX maintainer

Gichuru Riria

• 2006-07-25 05:01 help installing gcc 4.0.3

H. J. Lu

• 2006-07-15 22:19 The Linux binutils 2.17.50.0.3 is released
• 2006-07-16 17:26 ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library
• 2006-07-28 01:21 Re: ld -shared -Bsymbolic and C++ shared library
• 2006-07-30 23:38 Can we limit one bug fix per checkin please?

henrik . sorensen

• 2006-07-10 20:40 /bin/sh: build/genmodes: No such file or directory (was Re: gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available)
• 2006-07-11 01:54 Re: /bin/sh: build/genmodes: No such file or directory (was Re: gcc-4.2-20060708 is now available)

Herve Pages

• 2006-07-20 21:20 Successfully built and installed GCC 4.1.1 on our Solaris 2.9 machine

Ian Blanes

• 2006-07-09 00:27 Splay Tree
• 2006-07-12 02:02 Re: Splay Tree

Ian Lance Taylor

• 2006-07-04 17:15 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-04 20:27 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 14:12 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 14:51 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?
• 2006-07-05 15:13 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 15:39 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 15:43 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-05 16:23 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 20:21 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-06 22:09 Re: Addressing modes question
• 2006-07-07 17:11 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links
• 2006-07-07 17:14 Re: replace_rtx
• 2006-07-09 19:06 Re: problem in gcc port based on MIPS
• 2006-07-10 16:40 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++.
• 2006-07-11 16:19 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links
• 2006-07-12 04:41 Re: Need help
• 2006-07-13 00:57 Re: Question about vec_extract
• 2006-07-13 01:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 17:15 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links]
• 2006-07-14 17:30 Re: why are we not using const?
• 2006-07-16 16:02 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links]
• 2006-07-16 16:16 Re: Question of the LOG_LINKS field
• 2006-07-17 01:06 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-17 22:38 Re: Bootstrap broken on ppc-darwin
• 2006-07-18 21:45 Re: [gnu.org #296945] need an official copy of gcc 2.8.1.
• 2006-07-20 15:14 Re: 8086 backend and stack problem
• 2006-07-20 15:25 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-21 17:06 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-22 16:52 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-23 03:58 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering
• 2006-07-23 17:44 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 21:57 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-25 16:11 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-27 14:06 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation
• 2006-07-28 16:49 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation
• 2006-07-31 20:38 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?

J.J.Garcia

• 2006-07-04 17:58 dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
• 2006-07-05 09:27 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release)

Jack Howarth

• 2006-07-14 13:12 other major .so version bumps?
• 2006-07-14 23:36 gcc trunk vs python
• 2006-07-14 23:38 RE:gcc trunk vs python

jacob navia

• 2006-07-07 14:14 In which library is __register_frame_info defined??
• 2006-07-10 13:57 Questions regarding __register_frame_info
• 2006-07-13 14:46 Bug in the specs or bug in the code?
• 2006-07-13 14:47 How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-13 15:06 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-13 15:10 Re: Bug in the specs or bug in the code?
• 2006-07-13 15:48 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-13 18:36 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-19 10:09 JIT exception handling
• 2006-07-19 10:28 Re: JIT exception handling

Jakub Jelinek

• 2006-07-11 19:52 Re: [lto] libelf header

James E Wilson

• 2006-07-07 22:18 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-15 01:59 Re: Question about vec_extract

Jan Hubicka

• 2006-07-26 18:00 Patch for PR15832 and PR28071
• 2006-07-28 09:44 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!

Jan-Benedict Glaw

• 2006-07-10 19:38 Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...)

Janis Johnson

• 2006-07-11 19:29 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code?
• 2006-07-31 20:20 Re: New Ada testcases

Jason Merrill

• 2006-07-05 18:37 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-16)
• 2006-07-11 21:46 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 21:08 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 21:33 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 21:47 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 22:43 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 05:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 06:10 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-15 16:04 Re: gcc visibility used by moz

Jeffrey Law

• 2006-07-06 22:49 Re: Addressing modes question
• 2006-07-25 17:56 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?

Jim Wilson

• 2006-07-06 20:42 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
• 2006-07-06 20:48 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-07 22:49 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code?
• 2006-07-10 21:29 Re: ICE in compute_frame_pointer_to_fb_displacement (building avr-gcc)
• 2006-07-11 00:48 Re: make proto fails
• 2006-07-12 18:42 Re: Question about vec_extract
• 2006-07-17 22:43 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices
• 2006-07-17 22:48 Re: Question of the LOG_LINKS field
• 2006-07-17 22:58 Re: a question about code instrumentation in RTL level
• 2006-07-31 22:14 Re: reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend
• 2006-07-31 22:34 Re: [PATCH] improved algorithm for gcc/expmed.c::choose_multiplier()

Joe Buck

• 2006-07-12 22:14 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 16:46 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 18:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:27 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:59 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-18 16:43 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does
• 2006-07-30 04:33 Re: if() and trailing ;

Joe Butch

• 2006-07-27 15:10 Website Suggestion

Joern RENNECKE

• 2006-07-04 16:23 bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-04 18:13 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-04 18:47 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-04 19:06 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 16:49 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 17:48 Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check'
• 2006-07-05 20:59 RFA: new execute testcase (Was: Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check')
• 2006-07-06 17:24 Re: RFA: new execute testcase (Was: Re: bootstrap failed during 'make check')
• 2006-07-10 14:48 Re: Switch statement optimization
• 2006-07-12 16:06 RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-14 02:42 expand_divmod algorithm patented?
• 2006-07-16 15:18 where is the gcc wiki?
• 2006-07-16 15:31 Re: where is the gcc wiki?
• 2006-07-16 17:58 local data flow
• 2006-07-16 19:18 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-16 19:36 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-16 20:04 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-16 20:14 Re: Are 8-byte ints guaranteed?
• 2006-07-17 04:00 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 14:16 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 15:36 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 16:44 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 18:31 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 20:03 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 20:53 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-31 14:16 reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend

JohnWoods

• 2006-07-31 09:44 Best world production

Kaveh R. Ghazi

• 2006-07-14 17:22 Re: why are we not using const?
• 2006-07-15 03:44 Re: why are we not using const?
• 2006-07-25 20:21 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

Kazu Hirata

• 2006-07-05 14:57 A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-05 15:55 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-31 15:43 A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.
• 2006-07-31 16:39 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.
• 2006-07-31 16:40 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.

Kenneth Zadeck

• 2006-07-16 19:21 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-16 19:46 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-16 22:08 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 12:32 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 14:37 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 16:28 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 17:19 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 19:31 Re: local data flow
• 2006-07-17 20:23 Re: local data flow

kernel coder

• 2006-07-01 06:32 explaination of some gcc functions
• 2006-07-01 07:54 Re: explaination of some gcc functions
• 2006-07-09 15:10 problem in gcc port based on MIPS
• 2006-07-31 08:32 reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend
• 2006-07-31 15:24 Re: reduction of GP registers in MIPS backend

Kevin F. Quinn

• 2006-07-09 10:35 gcc vs gnu-classpath

Kithsiri Lekamge

• 2006-07-24 08:27 Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX
• 2006-07-26 07:10 Re: Problem compiling GCC source code in AIX
• 2006-07-28 07:43 _LARGE_FILES support in AIX -GCC compilation problem.

Lacy Enriquez

• 2006-07-31 14:37 Werden sie AutoTester

Laurynas Biveinis

• 2006-07-10 19:41 Re: Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...)
• 2006-07-10 19:56 Re: Mainline build broken (was: r115310 - in /trunk: fixincludes/ChangeLog fixi...)
• 2006-07-10 20:25 Re: gcc breakage
• 2006-07-11 07:27 Re: gcc breakage
• 2006-07-11 14:18 [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm
• 2006-07-17 15:39 Re: Importing boehm-gc 6.7?
• 2006-07-24 08:45 [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-24 11:22 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-24 13:41 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-25 13:07 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-26 17:32 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results
• 2006-07-26 17:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

Ling-hua Tseng

• 2006-07-15 23:53 Question of the LOG_LINKS field

Mark Kettenis

• 2006-07-26 21:33 Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT
• 2006-07-26 22:33 Re: [cygwin/mingw32] DBX_REGISTER_NUMBER vs DWARF2_FRAME_REF_OUT

Mark Mitchell

• 2006-07-05 15:53 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-05 15:58 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-06 05:40 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 03:42 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-08 00:59 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates
• 2006-07-12 06:41 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-12 06:58 Ben Elliston appointed DFP maintainer
• 2006-07-15 03:51 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 03:52 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-15 04:02 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 04:12 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-17 01:58 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-17 02:05 Re: [lto] factor code common to all builtin_function
• 2006-07-17 03:45 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-07-16)
• 2006-07-17 15:32 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-23 16:58 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:21 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:37 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 18:48 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 19:11 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-28 15:12 Re: gcc-4.3 projects page?
• 2006-07-31 16:37 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.
• 2006-07-31 23:55 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-07-31)

Martin Michlmayr

• 2006-07-29 10:16 Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?

Martin Reinecke

• 2006-07-03 08:27 Bootstrap broken

Matt Lee

• 2006-07-06 21:23 Addressing modes question

Maurizio Vitale

• 2006-07-13 17:48 x86_64 ABI

Michael Matz

• 2006-07-14 17:10 Re: x86_64 ABI
• 2006-07-17 14:32 Re: g77 problem for octave
• 2006-07-17 16:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-18 15:09 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?

Miguel Angel

• 2006-07-15 22:29 LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?

Mike Frysinger

• 2006-07-15 09:00 building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect"
• 2006-07-15 09:17 Re: building glibc-2.4 for alpha fails with "macro requires $at register while noat in effect"

Mike Stump

• 2006-07-01 20:47 Re: explaination of some gcc functions
• 2006-07-01 20:53 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-04 20:34 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
• 2006-07-05 17:49 Re: dejaGNU testsuite files for 2.95.3 20010315 (release)
• 2006-07-05 17:57 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?
• 2006-07-05 19:00 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 19:40 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-07 19:54 Re: GCC dejagnu testsuite: how to check for non-zero exit code?
• 2006-07-07 21:39 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-08 00:41 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-08 02:44 Re: In which library is __register_frame_info defined??
• 2006-07-10 19:10 Re: Questions regarding __register_frame_info
• 2006-07-10 19:52 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++.
• 2006-07-10 21:09 Re: gcc breakage
• 2006-07-11 01:20 Someone broke darwin?
• 2006-07-11 02:40 Re: Someone broke darwin?
• 2006-07-11 23:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm
• 2006-07-12 13:38 Re: New bootstrap failure on i386-unknown-freebsd5.4
• 2006-07-12 19:02 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-13 17:55 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)
• 2006-07-14 21:06 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:37 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 21:42 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-14 23:31 Re: gcc inline assembly on x86 platform
• 2006-07-17 23:13 Re: config/gnu.h, config/i386/gnu.h don't include copyright notices
• 2006-07-19 17:35 Re: JIT exception handling
• 2006-07-20 22:39 Re: GCC: Linking C program with callback-functions
• 2006-07-21 18:51 Re: c++ variable-length array?
• 2006-07-24 06:26 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend.
• 2006-07-25 17:35 Re: help installing gcc 4.0.3
• 2006-07-25 17:49 Re: why the difference of two global pointers is not a constant?
• 2006-07-27 01:21 Re: Strange floating point problems on SH4 with gcc 4.1.0
• 2006-07-27 15:34 Re: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation

Nathan Sidwell

• 2006-07-18 07:49 Re: Gcov: Counting lines of source code (untested files) as gcov does

Neal Becker

• 2006-07-21 14:20 c++ variable-length array?

Paolo Bonzini

• 2006-07-02 07:22 Re: What happend to bootstrap-lean?
• 2006-07-03 09:03 Re: Bootstrap broken
• 2006-07-06 16:40 Re: A question about TYPE_ARG_TYPES
• 2006-07-12 11:21 Re: Question about vec_extract
• 2006-07-13 08:30 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-13 15:56 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS

Paolo Carlini

• 2006-07-16 15:20 Re: where is the gcc wiki?

Paul Brook

• 2006-07-23 18:29 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.
• 2006-07-23 20:27 Re: Searching configured and relocated prefix.

Per Bothner

• 2006-07-31 17:47 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.

Rahul Phalak

• 2006-07-27 07:31 Suggestion required for appropriate implementation
• 2006-07-28 09:32 RE: Suggestion required for appropriate implementation

raja

• 2006-07-31 19:15 Two Library files with same name

Rajkishore Barik

• 2006-07-07 04:08 replace_rtx

Ramana Radhakrishnan

• 2006-07-19 10:38 query regarding ivopts.
• 2006-07-19 15:18 Re: query regarding ivopts.

Ranjit Mathew

• 2006-07-12 01:54 Re: [boehms-gc] Some work on ggc-boehm

Rask Ingemann Lambertsen

• 2006-07-07 16:34 Re: Addressing modes question
• 2006-07-16 14:00 Re: -mno-80387 and MMX autovectorisation
• 2006-07-19 11:25 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-19 12:09 Re: Indexed address problem
• 2006-07-19 12:47 Re: Project RABLET
• 2006-07-19 12:54 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-19 14:49 Re: Indexed address problem
• 2006-07-20 13:28 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-20 14:38 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-21 09:47 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-21 13:27 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-26 09:21 Re: Documentation for loop infrastructure

Rene Rebe

• 2006-07-05 18:11 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?
• 2006-07-05 18:40 Re: Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?

Richard Earnshaw

• 2006-07-03 12:49 Re: SP must be 8 byte aligned on entry to AAPCS-conforming functions
• 2006-07-20 13:09 RE: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help

Richard Guenther

• 2006-07-12 17:35 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-13 07:52 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-15 09:38 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-17 16:01 Re: LTO and Code Compaction \ Reverse Inlining \ Procedure Abstraction?
• 2006-07-19 07:49 Re: revamping synth_mult()
• 2006-07-28 10:02 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!
• 2006-07-28 10:04 Re: GCC missed optimization?
• 2006-07-28 11:47 Re: sorry, unimplemented: 64-bit mode not compiled in - ?!

Richard Henderson

• 2006-07-07 23:22 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-10 16:22 Re: externs and thread local storage

Richard Kenner

• 2006-07-08 00:32 Re: request of copyright assignment form
• 2006-07-12 18:31 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 03:58 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 04:04 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 04:15 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?
• 2006-07-15 04:24 Re: RFD: language hooks in GIMPLE / lang_flag?

Richard Sandiford

• 2006-07-24 18:08 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering

Roar Thronęs

• 2006-07-23 08:52 Re: gcc 4.1.1 and Bliss frontend.

Robert Dewar

• 2006-07-08 02:56 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-26 18:39 Re: [boehms-gc] Performance results

Roberto COSTA

• 2006-07-14 14:02 Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node
• 2006-07-14 14:25 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node

Rodney M. Bates

• 2006-07-07 02:10 Different invariants about the contents of static links
• 2006-07-11 14:06 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links
• 2006-07-12 21:25 Re: Different invariants about the contents of static links
• 2006-07-13 01:15 A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links]
• 2006-07-15 20:48 Re: A correction: Different invariants about the contents of static links]

Roger Sayle

• 2006-07-09 15:33 Re: Splay Tree

saajan . chana

• 2006-07-19 08:41 Message to send to gcc development list
• 2006-07-19 08:44 Indexed address problem

Saajan Singh Chana

• 2006-07-19 13:12 Re: Indexed address problem

sbalfour

• 2006-07-18 23:55 revamping synth_mult()

sean yang

• 2006-07-17 04:08 a question about code instrumentation in RTL level
• 2006-07-18 02:16 Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass
• 2006-07-28 18:56 converting a CALL_EXPR node without any argument into SSA form, thanks

Seongbae Park

• 2006-07-02 07:14 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-02 19:48 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-03 00:19 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-03 20:57 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-04 00:04 Re: externs and thread local storage
• 2006-07-13 18:21 Re: How to insert dynamic code? (continued)

shadow

• 2006-07-20 21:54 GCC: Linking C program with callback-functions

Shaun Jackman

• 2006-07-08 00:58 Re: [PATCH] config/arm/arm.c: Use GOT instead of GOTOFF when XIP

Simon Boulet

• 2006-07-29 23:33 if() and trailing ;
• 2006-07-30 02:19 Re: if() and trailing ;

Steve Ellcey

• 2006-07-10 22:14 Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory
• 2006-07-10 22:32 Re: Running aclocal in libstdc++-v3 directory

Steve Kargl

• 2006-07-10 20:36 Re: gcc breakage

Steven Bosscher

• 2006-07-01 17:59 Re: void* <-> char* aliasing rule, C standard or glitch?
• 2006-07-13 08:13 Re: BIT_FIELD_REF on the LHS
• 2006-07-16 20:38 Re: g77 problem for octave
• 2006-07-18 16:37 Re: website
• 2006-07-21 16:24 Re: Fortran fail on 4.0 branch
• 2006-07-23 09:07 Re: send a structure containing a pointer to another structure, over socket stream
• 2006-07-25 12:38 Re: How to extract internal tree structure information?
• 2006-07-29 09:46 What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?
• 2006-07-31 19:56 Re: [OT] Re: What happened to the gcc 4.2 vectorizer patches?

Thomas Koenig

• 2006-07-16 19:39 Are 8-byte ints guaranteed?

Tim Prince

• 2006-07-16 20:18 Re: Are 8-byte ints guaranteed?
• 2006-07-16 20:24 Re: g77 problem for octave

Todd Vierling

• 2006-07-17 15:06 Importing boehm-gc 6.7?

Tom Tromey

• 2006-07-17 18:50 Re: gcc vs gnu-classpath
• 2006-07-31 16:13 Re: A question about ARG_FINAL_P in the Java frontend.

Tristan Wibberley

• 2006-07-12 01:05 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 18:50 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:10 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:11 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:20 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 19:25 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 23:32 Re: gcc visibility used by moz
• 2006-07-12 23:39 Re: gcc visibility used by moz

truelies

• 2006-07-11 15:35 Re: How to deal with 1.#IND?

tyapici

• 2006-07-16 18:20 g77 problem for octave
• 2006-07-17 07:14 Re: g77 problem for octave

Ulrich Weigand

• 2006-07-05 19:09 Re: Ulrich Weigand appointed reload maintainer

Vladimir 'Yu' Stepanov

• 2006-07-10 05:52 request for new a syntactic design for C/C++.
• 2006-07-13 11:32 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++.
• 2006-07-13 15:42 Re: request for new a syntactic design for C/C++.

Vladimir Makarov

• 2006-07-26 19:38 Re: Patch for PR15832 and PR28071

Volker Reichelt

• 2006-07-26 22:31 New testsuite failures with -fprofile-use

Wolfgang Mües

• 2006-07-19 05:52 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help
• 2006-07-20 06:02 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help

Yuri Pudgorodsky

• 2006-07-04 13:05 gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 00:07 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 09:36 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 11:05 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 11:20 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 13:30 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 14:36 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 15:29 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 16:33 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-05 21:55 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 09:10 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"
• 2006-07-07 14:48 Re: gcc 4.2 more strict check for "function called through a non-compatible type"

Zdenek Dvorak

• 2006-07-17 11:46 Re: Calling gimplify_to_stmt_list (...) on a statement containing a TARGET_MEM_REF node
• 2006-07-18 14:31 Re: Inserting a GIMPLE node in a SSA form representation pass
• 2006-07-19 15:09 Re: query regarding ivopts.
• 2006-07-24 18:57 Documentation for loop infrastructure

zhou13

• 2006-07-05 02:43 Does SIMD optimization of GCC 3.4.6 work?

Indexes:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav:	[Browse other archives for this mailing list] [Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to: This time period only This mailing list only All mailing lists Entire site (no limit)