This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: make proto fails

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>
To: Andreas Jaeger <aj at suse dot de>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 19:42:26 -0700
Subject: Re: make proto fails
References: <m38xniwhpk.fsf@gromit.moeb> <je4py6pgjv.fsf@sykes.suse.de> <hor719pxa7.fsf@reger.suse.de>

Andreas Jaeger wrote:

Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
That's probably the same bug as PR21059.
That report even has a patch - but no action since december.  Jim,
will you handle this one?

It isn't exactly the same problem, as there is no auto-inc address here. So my patch in the PR doesn't look like it will help. We need one of the more complicated solutions which require a smarter CFG and/or smarter register lifetime check. I don't know if I can help with that. Others are doing more work in this area than I am.

This isn't a new problem. The .i file I produced from mainline generates the same failure with gcc-4.1 and gcc-4.0, and maybe also other gcc versions. I'm not sure what broke this, maybe it was the addition of -Werror to the Makefile.

As for my patch, I would like to finish it now that I'm functional again, but I've got a big backlog of stuff so I don't know when I will get to it. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com

References:
- make proto fails
  - From: Andreas Jaeger
- Re: make proto fails
  - From: Andreas Schwab
- Re: make proto fails
  - From: Andreas Jaeger

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]