This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <dan at codesourcery dot com>
To: Shaun Jackman <sjackman at gmail dot com>
Cc: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha at arm dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 17:19:01 -0400
Subject: Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?
References: <7f45d9390606281020u6ac474fckba4c60689bcd0060@mail.gmail.com> <20060628175924.GE13829@nevyn.them.org> <7f45d9390606281417x4145e25eo579cb8d5b123e343@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Jun 28, 2006 at 03:17:30PM -0600, Shaun Jackman wrote:
> I'm not terribly familiar with the GCC source tree. I scanned
> config/arm/arm.c and its SVN log for changes that might affect
> GOTOFF32, but came up empty. Do you know where the decision of GOT or
> GOTOFF would be handled?

Sorry, it was written quite a while ago.  I don't know.

> >We've implemented something similar to what you need for VxWorks.  A
> >couple of other places had to be changed.  I don't remember if the
> >VxWorks gcc port was submitted, or just the binutils bits.
> 
> Any chance of this work making it into GCC?

Yes - but we haven't had time to submit it.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?
  - From: Shaun Jackman

References:
- Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?
  - From: Shaun Jackman
- Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support?
  - From: Shaun Jackman

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]