This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Project RABLET

From: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>
To: Robert Dewar <dewar at adacore dot com>, Andrew MacLeod <amacleod at redhat dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2006 16:47:38 -0400
Subject: Re: Project RABLET
References: <1151090584.13088.26.camel@localhost.localdomain> <449C4114.3080305@adacore.com> <1151093277.13088.30.camel@localhost.localdomain> <449C4F49.60401@adacore.com> <20060623203216.GA3454@nevyn.them.org>

Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:

Please try the other definition, which he clearly meant:

     2. Of purely theoretical or academic interest; having no
        practical consequence; as, the team won in spite of the
        bad call, and whether the ruling was correct is a moot
        question.


Well I am not sure what he meant, but for sure it is not the
case that optimal register allocation and scheduling is of only
theoretical or academic interest with no practical consequences!

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Project RABLET
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- Project RABLET
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: Project RABLET
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Project RABLET
  - From: Andrew MacLeod
- Re: Project RABLET
  - From: Robert Dewar
- Re: Project RABLET
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]