This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion
"Manuel López-Ibáñez" <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
| On 10/06/06, Andrew Pinski <email@example.com> wrote:
| > Here is my vote, have four options:
| > -Wconversion the same as now.
| This is bad idea. Currently many people are relying in undocumented
| behaviour or the false perception that Wconversion detects risky
| conversions. If we keep Wconversion, they will keep using it wrongly.
| (I don't think most people will read Changelogs).
I don't believe we can just rename an existing option to another one
just like that. First, I need to see a clear definition of
"coercion", "conversion" and a clear statement why -Wconversion should
disappear because of your project.
| My new proposal: (c) make Wconversion obsolete.
I suggest you leave it, give a clear definition of "coercion".
We will decide later whether it should be obselete or not. I'm
unwilling to kill it or put it in a dust before seeing anything
concrete about -Wcoercion.