This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion


On Jun 10, 2006, at 1:30 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:

On 09/06/06, Eric Christopher <echristo@apple.com> wrote: 

I think I like b) the most. That way people who are accustomed to
using -Wconversion for value conversions can continue doing so and we
can move to something like -Wprototype-conversion or something for
the other (and stick the second in -Wall and have -Wconversion be
outside of that perhaps... that'd be up to others to debate though).

That would be fine with me. 

Here is my vote, have four options:
-Wconversion the same as now.
-Wprototype-conversion turns on part of -Wconversion
-Wcoercion the option you are dealing with
-Wconversion-signed the other part of the doc for -Wconversion


-- Pinski
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]