This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Geoffrey Keating <geoffk at apple dot com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, dpatel at apple dot com, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2006 23:34:36 -0400
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
References: <200606070025.k570PF23018944@earth.phy.uc.edu> <0C96C575-330D-484A-8414-D8BDB8BF61A6@apple.com>

On Tue, Jun 06, 2006 at 05:36:33PM -0700, Geoffrey Keating wrote:
> I don't see how making it a string makes this different.  Either your  
> new string will be a standard string or it won't.  Either your new  
> number will be a standard number or it won't.  If you want it to be  
> standard, you have to go through the committee.

In practice, using string identifiers does make conflicts less likely.
It's also easier for a vendor to pick a unique prefix and be confident
that Apple isn't going to assign some other meaning to
"csl-inline-bart".

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Devang Patel

References:
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Geoffrey Keating

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]