This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary

From: Tom Tromey <tromey at redhat dot com>
To: Devang Patel <devang dot patel at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: 06 Jun 2006 16:00:14 -0600
Subject: Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
References: <D18411CF-2155-42DC-9606-2F03926F20D7@apple.com> <A330F2C0-604A-4647-96E3-3984525B8EBE@apple.com> <m31wu2goyp.fsf@localhost.localdomain> <4485D1A8.9040007@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tromey at redhat dot com

>>>>> "Devang" == Devang Patel <devang.patel@gmail.com> writes:

Tom> * Why put the optimization diary into the object file?

[...]

Devang> 2) This info is consumed by other tools (e.g. IDE, performance
Devang> analyzer).  It makes sense for a tool like Shark to use dwarf
Devang> reader to get this info then parse raw text output.

Thanks, this makes sense to me.  I suggest adding this to your
document as rationale.

Tom

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Devang Patel

References:
- [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Devang Patel
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Tom Tromey
- Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary
  - From: Devang Patel

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]