This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
Cc: Richard Sandiford <richard at codesourcery dot com>, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Sun, 4 Jun 2006 13:52:26 -0700
Subject: Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
References: <4F2DF74A-5348-4D27-83A9-8F97110DA1B5@physics.uc.edu> <87lksde4h5.fsf@talisman.home> <571f6b510606040208m31e5e99bm80d0b8751e630ece@mail.gmail.com> <A5A65AE7-E3BA-438C-B8D9-0A0F5606EEFF@apple.com> <87mzcslmc9.fsf@talisman.home> <2EAAE2DE-CDCC-4463-B919-5604D840A3D3@physics.uc.edu>

On Jun 4, 2006, at 1:11 PM, Andrew Pinski wrote:

Yes but that is not all the problem because a lot of the time
the maintainer is also the submitter.  There is no way to discourage
the behavior of the maintainer on going on to other stuff while there
are known regressions to fix.

A wiki page of top regressions we care about? We could politely request general agreement that the ones listed be given priority.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Andrew Pinski

References:
- Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Andrew Pinski
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Richard Sandiford
- Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts
  - From: Andrew Pinski

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]