gcc archive
date index for June, 2006

This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:

June 30, 2006
22:47 gcc-4.1-20060630 is now available gccadmin
16:18 Notes from the BOF on DFP on x86/x86-64 at the GCC Summit Evandro Menezes
12:57 Notes of the libgcc-math BOF at the summit. Richard Guenther
10:04 Re: Information about .debug and .line section in elf files Oliver Eichler
05:47 PIC code in function prologue kernel coder
04:58 Re: GCC 4.1 on AIX 5.3 POWER 5 Andrew Pinski
04:41 Re: GCC 4.1 on AIX 5.3 POWER 5 Mike Stump
03:19 GCC 4.1 on AIX 5.3 POWER 5 Rajkishore Barik
02:42 Re: make proto fails Jim Wilson
02:03 Re: gcc port based on MIPS Ian Lance Taylor

June 29, 2006
22:39 gcc-4.0-20060629 is now available gccadmin
22:38 [PATCH] config/arm/arm.c: Use GOT instead of GOTOFF when XIP Shaun Jackman
22:01 Sortir, se distraire, se cultiver autour du Leman redaction
22:01 Sortir, se distraire, se cultiver autour du Leman redaction
20:54 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Daniel Berlin
20:34 Re: bootstrap of trunk fails for x86-64 Roger Sayle
18:33 Re: why are we not using const? Andrew Haley
17:58 Re: How to use gcc4 to compile FreeBSD6.0 ? Joe Buck
16:49 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Shaun Jackman
16:41 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Shaun Jackman
16:36 Re: why are we not using const? Chris Lattner
16:34 bootstrap of trunk fails for x86-64 Andreas Jaeger
16:20 Re: why are we not using const? Paolo Bonzini
16:15 Re: why are we not using const? Gabriel Dos Reis
16:12 Re: why are we not using const? Chris Lattner
15:18 RE: why are we not using const? Dave Korn
15:15 Re: why are we not using const? Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:08 Re: How to control to use the function static linked to a shared library Ian Lance Taylor
14:47 RE: why are we not using const? Dave Korn
14:44 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Jason Merrill
14:29 __float128 runtime support H. J. Lu
14:12 Re: why are we not using const? Richard Guenther
14:12 Re: why are we not using const? Andreas Schwab
14:06 RE: why are we not using const? Dave Korn
13:55 Re: why are we not using const? Andrew Pinski
13:51 RE: why are we not using const? Dave Korn
13:44 Re: why are we not using const? Richard Guenther
13:14 RE: How to control to use the function static linked to a shared library Hongbo Li
12:54 Re: How to use gcc4 to compile FreeBSD6.0 ? Rene Rebe
10:28 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Richard Earnshaw
10:04 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Richard Earnshaw
06:31 How to use gcc4 to compile FreeBSD6.0 ? Beyond.Luo
04:49 Re: why are we not using const? Gabriel Dos Reis
04:45 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Joe Buck
02:47 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Daniel Jacobowitz
02:37 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Mark Mitchell
02:25 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Geoffrey Keating
02:09 Re: How to control to use the function static linked to a shared library Ian Lance Taylor

June 28, 2006
23:27 Re: why are we not using const? Andrew Pinski
23:14 Re: why are we not using const? Kaveh R. Ghazi
23:05 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Danny Smith
22:01 Re: Need help Mike Stump
21:54 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Shaun Jackman
21:19 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Daniel Jacobowitz
21:17 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Shaun Jackman
20:59 Need help ammalik
20:21 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Ross Ridge
18:32 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Joe Buck
18:24 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Jason Merrill
18:22 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Mark Mitchell
17:59 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Joe Buck
17:59 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Daniel Jacobowitz
17:30 Re: Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Andrew Haley
17:20 How to deal with 1.#IND? truelies
17:20 Which patch added R_ARM_GOTOFF32 support? Shaun Jackman
16:56 How to control to use the function static linked to a shared library Hongbo Li
16:43 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Joe Buck
16:40 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Mark Mitchell
16:29 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Mark Mitchell
16:24 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman
16:21 Re: Information about .debug and .line section in elf files Michael Eager
15:52 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman
14:14 Re: why are we not using const? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:51 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Geoffrey Keating
13:33 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Geoffrey Keating
11:52 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Paolo Bonzini
11:40 Re: Information about .debug and .line section in elf files Saurabh Verma
10:21 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Erven ROHOU
08:10 Information about .debug and .line section in elf files Oliver Eichler
07:43 GCC 4.1.1 "François P. Rotzinger"
07:14 Re: make proto fails Andreas Jaeger
06:54 Re: make proto fails Andreas Jaeger
06:05 Re: make proto fails Ian Lance Taylor
05:53 Re: Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Albert Chin
00:46 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) David McCullough
00:22 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman

June 27, 2006
22:41 Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) David McCullough
20:42 dwarf2 initial_return_save vs gdb DJ Delorie
20:40 Re: why are we not using const? Tristan Wibberley
20:36 Re: why are we not using const? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
19:03 Re: make proto fails Andreas Schwab
18:56 make proto fails Andreas Jaeger
18:51 Re: why are we not using const? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
18:41 Re: why are we not using const? Daniel Berlin
18:18 Re: XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman
18:16 Re: [uClinux-dev] XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman
17:30 Re: Delayed branch scheduling pass destroys the CFG data? Steven Bosscher
17:03 XIP on an ARM processor (R_ARM_GOTOFF32) Shaun Jackman
16:50 Delayed branch scheduling pass destroys the CFG data? Minh D. Nguyen
16:15 Re: why are we not using const? Ross Ridge
16:05 Re: [RFA] Boehm GC support addition for debugging Marco Trudel
15:47 Re: why are we not using const? Theodore Papadopoulo
15:45 Re: Matching of non-standard instructions 'Rask Ingemann Lambertsen'
13:52 Re: why are we not using const? Andrew Pinski
13:50 Re: why are we not using const? Andrew Pinski
13:45 Re: why are we not using const? Gabriel Dos Reis
13:30 Re: why are we not using const? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
12:54 Re: gcc port based on MIPS kernel coder
12:51 why are we not using const? Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
12:44 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? Jan Hubicka
11:18 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? Joseph S. Myers
09:54 RE: Matching of non-standard instructions Roland Persson
07:48 Re: Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Paul Hilfinger
05:27 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? H. J. Lu
05:20 Re: [RFA] Boehm GC support addition for debugging Andreas Tobler
05:07 Re: [RFA] Boehm GC support addition for debugging Andrew Pinski
05:01 Re: [RFA] Boehm GC support addition for debugging Andrew Pinski
04:25 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? Ian Lance Taylor
04:14 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? Andrew Pinski
02:33 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Joe Buck
02:33 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Joe Buck

June 26, 2006
22:17 Re: Testing MULTILIB configurations Shaun Jackman
22:07 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Shaun Jackman
22:03 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Ian Lance Taylor
21:56 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Shaun Jackman
21:42 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Ian Lance Taylor
21:25 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Shaun Jackman
21:09 Re: Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? Ian Lance Taylor
21:04 Re: Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Ian Lance Taylor
20:54 Testing MULTILIB configurations Shaun Jackman
20:31 Why does __float80 depend on -mmmx/-msse? H. J. Lu
20:05 Specifying a MULTILIB dependency Shaun Jackman
19:10 Re: The default -mpic-register for -mthumb Shaun Jackman
18:53 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Christoph Hellwig
17:39 Re: Predcom branch status & call for testing Chris Lattner
17:25 Re: Matching of non-standard instructions Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:15 Re: Matching of non-standard instructions Ian Lance Taylor
16:51 Re: The default -mpic-register for -mthumb Richard Earnshaw
16:48 RE: Fortran Compiler Meissner, Michael
16:48 The default -mpic-register for -mthumb Shaun Jackman
16:04 Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug. Dirk Behme
15:56 Predcom branch status & call for testing Zdenek Dvorak
15:22 Re: Project RABLET Vladimir Makarov
15:02 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
14:54 Re: unable to detect exception model Mark Mitchell
14:40 Re: Project RABLET Richard Guenther
14:17 Matching of non-standard instructions Roland Persson
12:37 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
10:24 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
09:54 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
09:47 Re: unable to detect exception model Eric Botcazou
09:28 Re: unable to detect exception model Andrew Pinski
09:07 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
08:59 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
08:43 Re: unable to detect exception model Eric Botcazou
08:21 Re: Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Arnaud Charlet
07:44 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
07:32 Re: Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Florian Weimer
04:32 Re: Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Albert Chin
03:23 Re: unable to detect exception model Seongbae Park
01:02 ADMINISTRIVIA about Re: "Free as in Freedom" Christopher Faylor
00:54 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Steve Kargl
00:43 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Robert Dewar
00:43 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Alexander Verhaeghe
00:35 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Alexander Verhaeghe
00:35 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Steve Kargl
00:31 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Jan-Benedict Glaw
00:24 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Christopher Faylor
00:16 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Alexander Verhaeghe
00:15 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Brian Dessent
00:02 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Alexander Verhaeghe

June 25, 2006
23:49 Re: "Free as in Freedom" Jan-Benedict Glaw
23:47 Question concerning shared libraries in non-standard locations Paul Hilfinger
23:44 "Free as in Freedom" Alexander Verhaeghe
23:40 Re: How can I remove articles posted under my name? tobias . schlueter
22:49 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Paulo J. Matos
22:33 Re: How can I remove articles posted under my name? Steven Bosscher
22:33 Re: How can I remove articles posted under my name? Gerald Pfeifer
22:14 How can I remove articles posted under my name? Alexander Verhaeghe
21:57 RE: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Danny Smith
21:25 Re: unable to detect exception model Eric Botcazou
20:58 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
20:25 Re: unable to detect exception model Eric Botcazou
20:12 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
20:03 Re: unable to detect exception model Eric Botcazou
19:40 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
18:31 Re: unable to detect exception model Daniel Jacobowitz
18:20 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Laurynas Biveinis
18:19 Re: unable to detect exception model Andrew Pinski
18:12 Re: unable to detect exception model Daniel Jacobowitz
17:59 Re: unable to detect exception model Richard Guenther
15:27 Re: unable to detect exception model Andrew Pinski
14:07 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Paulo J. Matos
05:04 Re: Project RABLET Vladimir N. Makarov
01:27 Re: RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Ranjit Mathew

June 24, 2006
23:30 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
23:06 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
22:52 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Mark Mitchell
22:15 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Jason Merrill
21:13 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Laurynas Biveinis
20:54 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Andrew Pinski
20:52 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Laurynas Biveinis
20:43 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Laurynas Biveinis
18:32 Re: What is baseline for the testsuite? Laurynas Biveinis
17:55 gcc-4.2-20060624 is now available gccadmin
16:35 Re: Project RABLET Vladimir N. Makarov
13:57 Re: unable to detect exception model Andrew Pinski
11:04 Re: Project RABLET Steven Bosscher
10:46 Re: ICE in complex division FX Coudert
09:57 Re: g++ 4.1.1 Missing warning andrew
09:45 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Gabriel Dos Reis
09:29 Re: g++ 4.1.1 Missing warning andrew
09:05 Re: Lots of gfortrans testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux: undefined reference to `_gfortran_reshape_r8 Christian Joensson
09:00 Re: Lots of gfortrans testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux: undefined reference to `_gfortran_reshape_r8 FX Coudert
08:54 Re: Lots of gfortrans testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux: undefined reference to `_gfortran_reshape_r8 Christian Joensson
08:51 Fwd: Lots of gfortrans testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux: undefined reference to `_gfortran_reshape_r8 FX Coudert
05:46 Re: Project RABLET Ian Lance Taylor
04:44 Re: Project RABLET Andrew Pinski
04:39 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
04:20 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Mark Mitchell
04:16 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
03:29 Re: sh3e opcodes in sh2e's crt1.o? DJ Delorie
03:15 Re:sh3e opcodes in sh2e's crt1.o? Joern Rennecke
03:08 Re: Project RABLET Daniel Berlin
02:42 unable to detect exception model Jack Howarth
01:15 sh3e opcodes in sh2e's crt1.o? DJ Delorie
00:09 Re: Project RABLET Seongbae Park

June 23, 2006
22:41 gcc-4.1-20060623 is now available gccadmin
22:28 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Ian Lance Taylor
22:14 Re: Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Mark Mitchell
22:07 Re: Project RABLET Ian Lance Taylor
21:52 RFC: __cxa_atexit for mingw32 Danny Smith
21:40 Fortran Compiler hector riojas roldan
21:36 Re: Project RABLET Robert Dewar
21:01 Re: Project RABLET Steven Bosscher
20:47 Re: Project RABLET Robert Dewar
20:32 Re: Project RABLET Daniel Jacobowitz
20:30 Re: Project RABLET Robert Dewar
20:08 Re: Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
19:54 Visibility and C++ Classes/Templates Jason Merrill
19:29 Re: Project RABLET Robert Dewar
19:28 Re: Boehm-gc performance data David Nicol
19:23 Project RABLET Andrew MacLeod
18:37 RE: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Meissner, Michael
18:21 Fwd: Lots of gfortrans testsuite failuers on sparc64-linux: undefined reference to `_gfortran_reshape_r8 Christian Joensson
17:51 Re: Getting to the GCC Summit web page Dan Kegel
17:46 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Andrew Pinski
17:19 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Mike Stump
17:08 Re: Boehm-gc performance data Steven Bosscher
15:51 Boehm-gc performance data Laurynas Biveinis
01:06 Re: Source code of CIL back-end Daniel Berlin

June 22, 2006
22:41 gcc-4.0-20060622 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: Usage of -ftrapv Paulo J. Matos
21:50 Re: Wrong link? Bill Gatliff
20:57 Re: Wrong link? Gerald Pfeifer
20:49 HP/UX maintainers Gerald Pfeifer
19:58 Re: What is baseline for the testsuite? Daniel Berlin
19:47 Re: What is baseline for the testsuite? DJ Delorie
19:44 Re: What is baseline for the testsuite? DJ Delorie
19:35 Re: What is baseline for the testsuite? Mike Stump
19:25 What is baseline for the testsuite? Laurynas Biveinis
19:08 Re: !(fun) with tls NZG
19:05 Re: !(fun) with tls Daniel Jacobowitz
19:00 Re: !(fun) with tls Niklaus
17:51 TAF tan FIFA 2006 Resimleri Makinist
17:50 TAF tan FIFA 2006 Resimleri Makinist
16:29 TAF tan FIFA 2006 Resimleri Makinist
16:29 TAF tan FIFA 2006 Resimleri Makinist
13:59 g++ 4.1.1 Missing warning andrew
09:54 Source code of CIL back-end Roberto COSTA

June 21, 2006
21:43 Workwear Matt Watson
20:05 Re: pretty-print.c and gettext Bruno Haible
19:40 Re: pretty-print.c and gettext Joseph S. Myers
19:26 pretty-print.c and gettext Bruno Haible
19:18 Re: state of decimal float support in GCC Mark Mitchell
16:29 i686-unknown-winnt target not defined Niklaus
16:09 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Michael Matz
15:55 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
14:56 Re: Value numbering and volatility Daniel Berlin
14:39 Re: Value numbering and volatility Diego Novillo
14:27 Re: Value numbering and volatility Eric Botcazou
14:26 Re: Value numbering and volatility Andrew Pinski
14:12 Re: Value numbering and volatility Richard Guenther
14:01 Value numbering and volatility Eric Botcazou

June 20, 2006
20:36 Re: Darwin cross-compiler build failures on ppc MacOSX/Darwin Bill Northcott
18:05 Re: Minor doc error? Andrew Pinski
18:03 Minor doc error? Robert Crocombe
17:41 state of decimal float support in GCC Janis Johnson
16:56 Re: New GCC Backend Ian Lance Taylor
16:43 New GCC Backend Gyle Yearsley
16:39 C99 _Complex support in gcc Martin Reinecke
16:11 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
16:02 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
15:42 Re: Fields, unions, and code quality Andrew Haley
15:37 Re: Fields, unions, and code quality Daniel Berlin
15:36 Re: Fields, unions, and code quality Andrew Pinski
14:20 Fields, unions, and code quality Andrew Haley
14:12 Re: About gcc Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
13:52 Re: About gcc Roberto COSTA
13:33 Re: About gcc Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
13:16 Re: Question regarding the "Clean up how cse works" project Bernd Schmidt
11:43 RE: About gcc Dave Korn
11:03 [wwwdocs] logfile not as old as claimed Martin Michlmayr
10:39 Re: About gcc Roberto COSTA
09:41 Re: About gcc Paolo Carlini
09:08 About gcc Gunnar Sjoo
07:40 Re: gcc port based on MIPS Ian Lance Taylor
07:36 Re: gcc port based on MIPS kernel coder
02:07 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) tbp

June 19, 2006
23:46 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
22:35 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Daniel Jacobowitz
21:35 Re: Output of contrib/compare_tests Mike Stump
21:24 Question regarding the "Clean up how cse works" project Steven Bosscher
18:36 Re: gcc port based on MIPS Andrew Pinski
18:34 Re: gcc port based on MIPS Ian Lance Taylor
18:28 Re: gcc port based on MIPS kernel coder
17:41 Re: gcc port based on MIPS Ian Lance Taylor
16:42 Re: addressability checks in the gimplifier Olivier Hainque
16:34 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Richard Guenther
16:16 Re: gcc-4.1.0 cross-compile for MIPS Kai Ruottu
16:12 Re: Usage of -ftrapv Eric Botcazou
15:59 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Seongbae Park
15:51 Re: Usage of -ftrapv Ben Elliston
13:53 gcc port based on MIPS kernel coder
12:59 Re: Coroutines Ross Ridge
09:12 RE: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Dave Korn
06:27 Re: Coroutines Dustin Laurence
04:35 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Seongbae Park
03:10 Re: Coroutines Ross Ridge

June 18, 2006
23:46 Re: Output of contrib/compare_tests Daniel Berlin
23:03 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Paolo Carlini
22:52 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Jack Howarth
22:43 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Zdenek Dvorak
22:24 Re: Questions about another usage of GCOV Marc Alff
21:35 Output of contrib/compare_tests Mike Stein
21:02 Re: Coroutines Dustin Laurence
18:12 Re: Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) Robert Dewar
18:10 Optimize flag breaks code on many versions of gcc (not all) minus
17:44 Re: Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Tom Tromey
12:29 Re: Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Laurynas Biveinis
09:20 Re: Questions about another usage of GCOV Nicholas Nethercote
04:44 Re: Questions about another usage of GCOV Joe Buck
02:22 Re: Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Daniel Berlin
01:40 Questions about another usage of GCOV Marc Alff
00:25 Re: Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Laurynas Biveinis

June 17, 2006
23:41 Re: Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Daniel Berlin
22:02 Re: cross compiler problem Steven Bosscher
21:56 cross compiler problem Piotr Pałka
17:55 gcc-4.2-20060617 is now available gccadmin
16:13 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
15:05 Re: Where is the egg? Gerald Pfeifer
14:25 Re: c++ - inquiry Richard Guenther
14:19 c++ - inquiry Bernhard Guenther
13:50 Re: Coroutines Maurizio Vitale
11:19 Boehm's GC crashed by adjustment of GC root set Laurynas Biveinis
09:28 Re: Coroutines Gabriel Dos Reis
08:52 Re: Coroutines Andrew Haley
08:17 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:20 Re: Usage of -ftrapv Mike Stump
02:59 Re: Coroutines Dustin Laurence
02:43 Re: Coroutines Dustin Laurence
00:57 Re: Usage of -ftrapv Andrew Pinski
00:50 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-16) Mark Mitchell
00:43 Usage of -ftrapv Paulo J. Matos

June 16, 2006
23:20 Re: Coroutines Geoffrey Keating
22:43 gcc-4.1-20060616 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Re: Coroutines David Nicol
21:12 Re: MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Ian Lance Taylor
21:05 Re: Coroutines Mike Stump
20:42 Coroutines Dustin Laurence
20:37 Re: try/finally in GNU C Mike Stump
19:00 Re: try/finally in GNU C Mike Stump
18:53 Re: c99 VLA semantics Mike Stump
18:11 Re: c99 VLA semantics Mike Stump
17:51 Re: c99 VLA semantics Joseph S. Myers
16:48 MIPS RDHWR instruction reordering Atsushi Nemoto
16:28 RE: gcc-4.1.0 cross-compile for MIPS Dave Korn
15:47 Re: gcc-4.1.0 cross-compile for MIPS David Daney
15:42 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Tom Tromey
14:03 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? David Edelsohn
13:57 RE: c99 VLA semantics Dave Korn
13:54 RE: What assertions to use in libcpp? Dave Korn
13:11 Re: try/finally in GNU C Jonathan Wilson
12:53 Re: try/finally in GNU C Gabriel Dos Reis
12:43 Re: Top-level bootstrap question Richard Kenner
11:44 gcc-4.1.0 cross-compile for MIPS kernel coder
08:37 What assertions to use in libcpp? Laurynas Biveinis
08:02 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
07:47 Re: try/finally in GNU C Paolo Bonzini
07:43 Re: Top-level bootstrap question Paolo Bonzini
07:21 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Michael Matz
07:01 Re: try/finally in GNU C Ian Lance Taylor
06:15 Re: try/finally in GNU C Steven Bosscher
05:51 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Eric Botcazou
02:58 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Geoffrey Keating
01:28 Re: libsupc++.a(eh_globals.o): In function `__gnu_internal::get_global()': undefined reference to `___tls_get_addr' yang xiaoxin
01:02 c99 VLA semantics Mike Stump
01:00 Re: try/finally in GNU C Mike Stump
00:00 Re: try/finally in GNU C Gabriel Dos Reis

June 15, 2006
23:47 Re: try/finally in GNU C Andrew Pinski
23:42 Re: try/finally in GNU C Gabriel Dos Reis
23:38 Re: try/finally in GNU C Gabriel Dos Reis
23:32 Re: try/finally in GNU C Andrew Pinski
23:31 Re: try/finally in GNU C Joe Buck
23:21 Re: try/finally in GNU C Andrew Pinski
23:07 try/finally in GNU C Gabriel Dos Reis
22:40 gcc-4.0-20060615 is now available gccadmin
22:34 Top-level bootstrap question Richard Kenner
22:17 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Richard Kenner
22:11 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
21:26 Re: Deprecating -f options? Kenneth Zadeck
20:53 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Mike Stump
20:02 A new branch boehms-gc created Laurynas Biveinis
19:53 Re: Deprecating -f options? Mike Stump
19:28 Re: Bachelors, {}Masters, MBA and/or Doctorate (PhD) Reynaldo Patterson
19:09 Re: Deprecating -f options? Joern RENNECKE
18:21 Re: Deprecating -f options? Andrew MacLeod
18:13 Re: gcc modifications for an arm architecture Joern RENNECKE
18:09 Re: Deprecating -f options? Steven Bosscher
18:09 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
18:06 Re: Deprecating -f options? Joern RENNECKE
17:55 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Zdenek Dvorak
17:31 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Daniel Berlin
17:21 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
17:15 RE: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Dave Korn
17:12 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Richard Guenther
17:09 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
17:07 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
17:04 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Diego Novillo
16:36 Deprecating -f options? Andrew MacLeod
15:16 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Sebastian Pop
14:57 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
14:35 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Daniel Jacobowitz
14:33 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Andrew Pinski
14:32 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Robert Dewar
14:21 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Daniel Jacobowitz
14:05 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Robert Dewar
13:59 Re: sh-elf build failure on mainline] Joern RENNECKE
13:25 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Sebastian Pop
12:58 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation kernel coder
10:40 Re: Code Flow for RTL generation Andrew Haley
10:36 Code Flow for RTL generation kernel coder
09:56 Re: Some C++0x experiments Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
09:45 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
09:35 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
09:14 gcc modifications for an arm architecture Leontie Eugen
06:42 Re: {Spam?} Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Paolo Bonzini
01:10 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Mike Stump

June 14, 2006
23:47 Re: Some C++0x experiments Pedro Lamarão
23:22 RE: Where is the egg? Gerald Pfeifer
22:50 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
22:41 Re: what motivates people to submit patches anyway? Joe Buck
22:36 sh-elf build failure on mainline] Joern RENNECKE
20:57 what motivates people to submit patches anyway? David Nicol
20:42 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Ian Lance Taylor
20:13 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Eric Botcazou
18:54 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Andrew Pinski
18:51 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Joe Buck
18:35 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Mike Stump
17:23 DLLs for GCC/Windows (Was: Re: Cross-compilation and Shared Libraries) Ranjit Mathew
15:11 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Ian Lance Taylor
14:54 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Richard Guenther
14:52 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Diego Novillo
14:03 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Daniel Berlin
13:55 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Ian Lance Taylor
12:35 RE : Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Etienne Lorrain
12:26 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Daniel Berlin
10:58 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
10:56 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
09:48 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Etienne Lorrain
05:56 Re: Cross-compilation and Shared Libraries Ranjit Mathew
04:44 Re: Cross-compilation and Shared Libraries Brian Dessent
04:07 Cross-compilation and Shared Libraries Ranjit Mathew
03:47 Re: Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Ian Lance Taylor
03:24 Patch queue and reviewing (Was Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled?) Daniel Berlin
00:47 Re: Darwin cross-compiler build failures on ppc MacOSX/Darwin Mike Stump
00:40 Re: Darwin cross-compiler build failures on ppc MacOSX/Darwin Bill Northcott

June 13, 2006
19:33 Re: CIL back-end Joe Buck
19:15 Re: Darwin cross-compiler build failures on ppc MacOSX/Darwin Mike Stump
18:39 Re: CIL back-end Mike Stump
18:32 Re: GCC 4.2 emitting static template constants as global symbols? Benjamin Redelings
18:31 Re: Problem with type safety and the "sentinel" attribute Stefan Westerfeld
18:10 Re: GCC 4.2 emitting static template constants as global symbols? Andrew Pinski
18:08 Re: GCC 4.2 emitting static template constants as global symbols? Benjamin Redelings
17:05 Re: CIL back-end Daniel Berlin
15:53 Re: libsupc++.a(eh_globals.o): In function `__gnu_internal::get_global()': undefined reference to `___tls_get_addr' Jakub Jelinek
15:45 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Eric Botcazou
15:35 Re: libsupc++.a(eh_globals.o): In function `__gnu_internal::get_global()': undefined reference to `___tls_get_addr' Ian Lance Taylor
14:56 Re: CIL back-end Sebastian Pop
12:17 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
11:37 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
11:01 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
10:46 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
10:37 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
10:12 Re: GCC trunk build failed on ia64: ICE in __gcov_init Maxim Kuvyrkov
09:55 GCC trunk build failed on ia64: ICE in __gcov_init Grigory Zagorodnev
09:19 Re: CIL back-end Andrew Haley
09:03 Re: CIL back-end Roberto COSTA
09:02 Re: gcc 4.1.1, template specialisation, -O3 Richard Guenther
08:31 gcc 4.1.1, template specialisation, -O3 Gavin Band
08:30 Re: {Spam?} Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Eric Botcazou
08:21 Darwin cross-compiler build failures on ppc MacOSX/Darwin Bill Northcott
08:20 Re: {Spam?} Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
08:13 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Eric Botcazou
08:05 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
07:59 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Eric Botcazou
07:11 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
07:06 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
06:16 libsupc++.a(eh_globals.o): In function `__gnu_internal::get_global()': undefined reference to `___tls_get_addr' yang xiaoxin
05:47 Re: GCC 4.2 emitting static template constants as global symbols? Ian Lance Taylor
03:16 GCC 4.2 emitting static template constants as global symbols? Benjamin Redelings

June 12, 2006
23:59 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Ian Lance Taylor
22:35 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
19:56 Re: sparc elf Jim Wilson
19:33 Re: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target Jim Wilson
18:49 Re: CIL back-end Daniel Berlin
18:01 Re: CIL back-end Ori Bernstein
17:38 Re: CIL back-end Joe Buck
17:30 Re: CIL back-end Ori Bernstein
17:26 Re: CIL back-end Robert Dewar
17:22 Re: CIL back-end Ori Bernstein
17:21 Re: CIL back-end Ori Bernstein
16:59 Re: sparc elf Martin Guy
16:53 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Mark Mitchell
16:36 Re: CIL back-end Joe Buck
16:26 Re: algorithm to parse a propositional logic formula Joe Buck
16:00 Re: CIL back-end Daniel Berlin
15:48 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Mike Stump
15:41 Re: CIL back-end Roberto COSTA
15:15 Re: CIL back-end Andrew Pinski
14:56 Re: CIL back-end Sebastian Pop
14:46 Re: CIL back-end Diego Novillo
14:41 Re: CIL back-end Sebastian Pop
14:34 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? David Edelsohn
14:24 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Daniel Jacobowitz
14:23 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? David Edelsohn
13:21 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
13:20 algorithm to parse a propositional logic formula Riccardo
12:58 sparc elf Niklaus
12:51 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Diego Novillo
12:47 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
12:42 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
12:38 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
12:36 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
12:35 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Diego Novillo
12:31 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
12:31 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
12:29 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
12:21 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Richard Guenther
12:17 Re: CIL back-end Diego Novillo
12:17 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
12:03 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
11:50 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
11:32 Re: help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug Andrew Haley
11:19 help interpreting gcc 4.1.1 optimisation bug andrew
08:45 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Paolo Bonzini
08:07 Re: a problem when building gcc3.2.1 Kai Ruottu
08:00 Re: Where is the egg? Thomas Neumann
07:52 CIL back-end Roberto COSTA
07:08 a problem when building gcc3.2.1 Eric Fisher
03:27 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Dustin Laurence
03:15 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site DJ Delorie
03:10 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site DJ Delorie
02:06 RE: Where is the egg? Stephan T. Lavavej
00:26 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gabriel Dos Reis
00:04 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Daniel Berlin

June 11, 2006
23:56 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
22:03 Re: Thoughts on gcc maintainership and project merging Gerald Pfeifer
21:34 Re: Where is the egg? Gerald Pfeifer
20:52 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? David Edelsohn
20:45 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Mark Mitchell
20:41 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Gabriel Dos Reis
20:30 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? David Edelsohn
20:28 Re: Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Andrew Pinski
20:20 Generator programs can only be built with optimization enabled? Mark Mitchell
20:05 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Andrew Pinski
20:00 Re: Missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+? Anny Blackyew
19:59 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
18:36 Re: Missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+? Anny Blackyew
18:33 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Gerald Pfeifer
18:33 Re: Missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+? Gerald Pfeifer
18:22 Re: Missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+? Andrew Pinski
18:10 Missing -march=sempron -mtune=sempron -msse3 -m3dnow+? Anny Blackyew
16:42 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:39 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
16:31 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
15:30 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Gabriel Dos Reis
15:13 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Gabriel Dos Reis
14:57 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Gabriel Dos Reis
12:36 gcc 4.1.1 Successful build - Cedric Arbogast Cedric A
10:22 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
10:10 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
07:19 givs Brand
02:29 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Gabriel Dos Reis

June 10, 2006
23:23 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
22:53 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Andrew Pinski
22:49 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
22:01 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Andrew Pinski
20:30 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
20:11 Re: Highlevel C Backend Paul Brook
18:38 Re: Some C++0x experiments Howard Hinnant
17:56 gcc-4.2-20060610 is now available gccadmin
17:44 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Andrew Haley
16:05 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Andrew Pinski
16:04 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Jack Howarth
13:18 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Andrew Pinski
11:05 Re: GIMPLE / induction variable analysis Jay L.T. Cornwall
09:12 Re: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target Andreas Schwab
08:25 Re: GIMPLE / induction variable analysis Zdenek Dvorak
08:00 Re: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target Mike Stump
07:31 RE: Errors while building bootstrap GCC for "mipsisa32-elf" target Monika Sapra
07:23 Re: bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Thomas Fitzsimmons
06:45 Re: Some C++0x experiments Mike Stump
03:44 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software Richard Kenner
02:38 Re: Some C++0x experiments Andrew Pinski
02:32 bootstrap broken on PPC-darwin and other targets without pkg-config (which is almost all) Andrew Pinski
01:32 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Daniel Berlin
01:31 Some C++0x experiments Pedro LamarÃo
01:09 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Andrew MacLeod

June 09, 2006
23:32 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Daniel Berlin
23:22 Re: GCC 3.4.6 problem Jim Wilson
23:12 Re: RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Steven Bosscher
22:47 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software Peter Naulls
22:45 gcc-4.1-20060609 is now available gccadmin
22:33 Re: Highlevel C Backend Joel Dice
22:26 Re: Highlevel C Backend David Nicol
22:23 Re: Wconversion versus Wcoercion Eric Christopher
22:00 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software Mike Stump
21:54 RFC: gimple tuples data structures design Aldy Hernandez
21:54 Re: GIMPLE / induction variable analysis Daniel Berlin
21:49 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software Joe Buck
21:49 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software xiaoyi wang
20:53 Re: GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software Mike Stump
20:41 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Shantonu Sen
20:38 problem implementing language-specific gimplify of TRUTH_ANDIF expression Gary Funck
20:32 Re: PR 26792 Geoffrey Keating
20:10 GIMPLE / induction variable analysis Jay L. T. Cornwall
19:29 GPL question: Use gcc to build proprietary software xiaoyi wang
17:31 Re: Problem with type safety and the "sentinel" attribute Tim Janik
16:31 Re: Problem with type safety and the "sentinel" attribute Kaveh R. Ghazi
15:08 Problem with type safety and the "sentinel" attribute Stefan Westerfeld
14:46 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
14:24 Re: PR 26792 Jack Howarth
14:05 GCC 3.4.6 problem Roland Persson
12:15 Re: Highlevel C Backend Sebastian Pop
12:11 Re: Highlevel C Backend Fabian Scheler
11:52 Re: Highlevel C Backend Steven Bosscher
11:35 Re: Highlevel C Backend Fabian Scheler
11:28 Re: Highlevel C Backend Sebastian Pop
11:14 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Sebastian Pop
11:07 Highlevel C Backend Fabian Scheler
06:41 Re: Help with following RTL Ian Lance Taylor
06:18 Help with following RTL kernel coder
00:24 Re: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu

June 08, 2006
23:05 Re: TLS on windows Ross Ridge
22:53 Wconversion versus Wcoercion Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
22:41 gcc-4.0-20060608 is now available gccadmin
22:25 RE: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Menezes, Evandro
21:59 Re: PR 26792 Geoffrey Keating
21:52 Re: TLS on windows Richard Henderson
21:41 Re: TLS on windows (was: Re: Gfortran on Windows (mingw32) with OpenMP) Richard Henderson
21:11 Re: Problem with address reloading Jim Wilson
21:02 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
20:43 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Diego Novillo
20:36 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Richard Henderson
19:05 Re: SVN branch for current Boehm's GC + GCC code? Daniel Berlin
18:58 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Michael Matz
18:38 RE: Problem with address reloading Juul Vanderspek
18:22 RE: Problem with address reloading Dave Korn
18:14 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
18:06 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Daniel Berlin
17:58 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Zdenek Dvorak
17:56 RE: Problem with address reloading Juul Vanderspek
17:51 RE: Problem with address reloading Dave Korn
17:22 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Daniel Berlin
17:19 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Michael Matz
16:58 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Richard Guenther
16:55 Problem with address reloading Juul Vanderspek
16:47 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Michael Matz
16:42 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Daniel Berlin
16:42 Re: SVN branch for current Boehm's GC + GCC code? Richard Guenther
16:33 Re: g++ compiler enhancement request Joe Buck
16:33 Re: [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Richard Guenther
16:25 [LTO] Flattening memory expressions? Diego Novillo
16:12 RE: SVN branch for current Boehm's GC + GCC code? Dave Korn
16:01 Re: -mno-80387 and MMX autovectorisation Andrew Pinski
15:36 SVN branch for current Boehm's GC + GCC code? Laurynas Biveinis
14:58 Re: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu
14:48 PR 26792 Jack Howarth
13:13 Re: Symbol table resolution Andrew Haley
07:30 Re: apply for the relevant forms Manuel LÃpez-IbÃÃez
06:28 -mno-80387 and MMX autovectorisation Uros Bizjak
04:04 apply for the relevant forms liqin
03:13 Re: apply for the relevant forms Jie Zhang

June 07, 2006
23:39 RE: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Menezes, Evandro
22:57 Re: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu
22:18 RE: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Menezes, Evandro
22:17 Re: g++ compiler enhancement request Perry Smith
21:53 Re: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu
21:08 RE: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Menezes, Evandro
21:07 RE: RFC: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Menezes, Evandro
21:06 Re: g++ compiler enhancement request Steven Bosscher
21:01 Re: g++ compiler enhancement request Ian Lance Taylor
20:20 g++ compiler enhancement request lkeren
20:09 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Paul Brook
19:55 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
19:47 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
19:31 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
18:49 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
18:37 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
18:33 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Jacobowitz
18:29 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
18:05 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
17:54 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Daniel Berlin
17:49 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Laurynas Biveinis
17:35 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
17:25 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
17:22 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
17:20 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Daniel Jacobowitz
17:19 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Daniel Berlin
17:18 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
17:11 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
17:00 Re: RFC: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu
16:59 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
16:57 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Laurynas Biveinis
16:44 Re: RFC: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement Sandro Tolaini
16:23 RFC: x86 Linux stack alignment requirement H. J. Lu
15:32 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Paolo Bonzini
15:21 Re: Thoughts about GC root sets Daniel Berlin
15:09 Thoughts about GC root sets Laurynas Biveinis
14:02 RE: Inline memcpy in GCC 4.1.1 Jon Beniston
13:47 Re: RTL explaination David Edelsohn
13:14 Re: RTL explaination Steven Bosscher
13:08 RTL explaination kernel coder
10:59 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Martin Michlmayr
10:43 Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Ayal Zaks
09:38 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
09:19 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Richard Earnshaw
09:10 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Richard Earnshaw
08:44 sickle dazzling Eddie Chamberlain
06:20 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
05:45 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
05:35 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
05:22 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
05:08 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
05:05 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
04:50 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
04:50 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
03:55 Re: TLS on windows (was: Re: Gfortran on Windows (mingw32) with OpenMP) Henry Kar Ming Chan
03:34 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Jacobowitz
03:02 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
00:52 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
00:34 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
00:25 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
00:23 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
00:21 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
00:19 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
00:11 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Berlin
00:03 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
00:03 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski

June 06, 2006
23:58 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Berlin
23:55 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Geoffrey Keating
22:18 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
22:16 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
22:03 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
21:52 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Gabriel Dos Reis
21:38 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Berlin
21:10 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Joe Buck
21:08 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
20:54 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Daniel Jacobowitz
20:51 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Ramana Radhakrishnan
20:48 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Gabriel Dos Reis
20:45 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Gabriel Dos Reis
19:53 Re: Does Hegel Justify His Views? Dustin Laurence
19:52 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
19:50 Re: Oops David Nicol
19:38 Oops Peter Michael Gerdes
19:37 Does Hegel Justify His Views? Peter Michael Gerdes
19:34 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
19:25 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
19:18 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
19:08 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Andrew Pinski
19:04 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
18:49 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
18:27 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
17:47 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Tom Tromey
17:22 Re: Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option Steve Kargl
17:20 Re: Inline memcpy in GCC 4.1.1 Joern RENNECKE
16:46 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
16:31 Fw: GCC SC request about ecj Davanum Srinivas
16:05 RE: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug. Dave Korn
15:59 Re: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Ron McCall
15:52 Build report for AIX 5.1 Mario Linke
15:17 Inline memcpy in GCC 4.1.1 Jon Beniston
14:34 RE: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug. Dave Korn
14:21 Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug. Richard Earnshaw
14:07 Re: ARM gcc 4.1 optimization bug. Dirk Behme
13:58 Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Richard Guenther
09:45 Re: [MinGW] Set NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR relative to configured prefix Ranjit Mathew
09:39 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Richard Sandiford
08:53 Re: Fw: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Ayal Zaks
07:58 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Bernd Schmidt
06:17 Re: Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option FX Coudert
06:11 Re: Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option FX Coudert
05:42 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
05:19 Re: [MinGW] Set NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR relative to configured prefix Ross Ridge
05:13 Re: [MinGW] Set NATIVE_SYSTEM_HEADER_DIR relative to configured prefix Ross Ridge
04:52 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Andrew Pinski
03:25 Re: Where is the egg? Stephan T. Lavavej
03:08 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Shantonu Sen
02:37 Re: Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option Steve Kargl
02:33 Re: Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option Andrew Pinski
02:28 Recent VCG changes break gfortran's -std=f95 option Steve Kargl
02:06 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Geoffrey Keating
01:55 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
01:30 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Geoffrey Keating
01:10 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
00:30 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Mark Mitchell

June 05, 2006
22:12 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Geoffrey Keating
21:58 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
21:38 Re: Where is the egg? Gabriel Dos Reis
21:28 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Tom Tromey
21:26 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site DJ Delorie
21:15 Re: [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Martin Michlmayr
20:58 Re: which cctool on Darwin? Geoffrey Keating
20:51 [wwwdocs] Complete revamp of our web site Gerald Pfeifer
20:44 which cctool on Darwin? Jack Howarth
20:18 Where is the egg? Steven Bosscher
18:57 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Joern RENNECKE
18:26 Re: Solaris 2.8 build failure for 4.1.1 (libtool/libjava) Jim Wilson
17:11 Re: Objective C++ Bundling Paolo Bonzini
15:47 Re: Objective C++ Bundling Mike Stump
15:10 Re: Why are we installing libtool files now? Tom Tromey
14:17 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
12:25 Objective C++ Bundling Ranjit Mathew
12:22 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Paul Brook
12:20 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Richard Earnshaw
11:47 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
11:31 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang MÃes
10:12 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
10:07 Re: A reload failure which I can't figure out Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
10:07 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Richard Earnshaw
10:01 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
08:37 apply for the relevant forms liqin
01:24 Re: GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Daniel Berlin
01:12 apply for the relevant forms liqin
00:12 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Dave Murphy

June 04, 2006
22:03 Re: Why are we installing libtool files now? Andrew Pinski
22:01 Re: Why are we installing libtool files now? Richard Guenther
21:59 Why are we installing libtool files now? Gerald Pfeifer
21:36 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
21:22 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
21:08 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Andrew Pinski
21:01 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:58 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Andrew Pinski
20:53 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Mike Stump
20:43 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Gabriel Dos Reis
20:27 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Andrew Pinski
20:23 GCC 4.2 Status Report (2006-06-04) Mark Mitchell
20:19 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Richard Sandiford
20:10 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
20:10 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Andrew Pinski
20:03 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Richard Sandiford
20:00 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Sandiford
19:33 Re: [Bug middle-end/27590] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when compiling catalina.jar from tomcat 5.0.30 Mark Mitchell
19:21 Re: [Bug middle-end/27590] [4.1/4.2 Regression] ICE when compiling catalina.jar from tomcat 5.0.30 Andrew Haley
18:50 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Mitchell
18:44 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Daniel Jacobowitz
18:32 MAPPED_LOCATION update Per Bothner
17:29 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Mitchell
17:21 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Daniel Jacobowitz
17:14 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Mike Stump
16:55 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Mitchell
15:57 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Paul Brook
15:26 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
12:03 Re: TLS on windows (was: Re: Gfortran on Windows (mingw32) with OpenMP) Piotr Wyderski
11:52 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Gerald Pfeifer
11:25 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Paul Brook
11:06 Re: TLS on windows Ross Ridge
10:31 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
09:09 TLS on windows (was: Re: Gfortran on Windows (mingw32) with OpenMP) FX Coudert
09:08 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Steven Bosscher
09:06 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Sandiford
07:59 Re: Release Schedule issues and doubts Richard Sandiford

June 03, 2006
22:05 Release Schedule issues and doubts Andrew Pinski
17:52 gcc-4.2-20060603 is now available gccadmin
16:56 Re: GCC SC request about ecj Tom Tromey
16:25 [wwwdocs] Re: ftp://ftp.eos.hokudai.ac.jp/pub/gcc/ Gerald Pfeifer
14:14 Re: Solaris 2.8 build failure for 4.1.1 (libtool/libjava) Eric Botcazou
12:35 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
03:54 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Andi Kleen
00:31 gen_lowpart vs big endian insv DJ Delorie
00:19 RE: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang

June 02, 2006
23:27 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Mike Stump
23:14 Re: [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
23:02 [RFC] Optimization Diary Devang Patel
22:47 gcc-4.1-20060602 is now available gccadmin
22:32 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
22:17 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
22:03 Solaris 2.8 build failure for 4.1.1 (libtool/libjava) Joe Buck
21:58 gcc 4.1.1 build reports: 3 gnu/linux flavors, HP/UX, Solaris 2.8 Joe Buck
21:33 Re: GCC SC request about ecj Joe Buck
18:08 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
18:00 Re: GCC SC request about ecj Per Bothner
15:55 Re: Bug in gnu assembler? Andrew Pinski
15:55 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
15:52 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Paul Brook
15:47 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
15:46 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Mitchell
15:46 Bug in gnu assembler? jacob navia
15:35 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Daniel Jacobowitz
15:32 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
15:28 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Paul Brook
15:23 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Daniel Jacobowitz
15:21 RE: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Davis, Mark
15:21 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
15:10 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
14:31 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Shinwell
14:18 Re: [wwwdocs] releases.html v/s develop.html Ranjit Mathew
14:09 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address David Edelsohn
13:57 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Shinwell
12:25 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Richard Earnshaw
11:01 addressability checks in the gimplifier Olivier Hainque
11:00 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
10:36 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
09:50 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Steven Bosscher
09:48 Re: [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Andrey Belevantsev
09:48 Re: [wwwdocs] releases.html v/s develop.html Gerald Pfeifer
09:14 [patch] Improve loop array prefetch for IA-64 Canqun Yang
07:24 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
06:24 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Wolfgang Mües
02:34 Re: Libiberty Bill Cunningham
02:22 Re: Libiberty DJ Delorie
02:16 Libiberty Bill Cunningham
01:49 Re: Segment registers support for i386 RÃmy Saissy

June 01, 2006
23:43 Re: c++ regression in trunk Jack Howarth
23:14 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Jim Wilson
23:08 Re: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Mike Stump
22:39 gcc-4.0-20060601 is now available gccadmin
22:25 Re: [wwwdocs] releases.html v/s develop.html Joe Buck
21:43 Re: [wwwdocs] releases.html v/s develop.html Gerald Pfeifer
20:42 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
20:36 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Joseph S. Myers
20:26 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
19:52 Re: Difference between 'FOR_EACH_BB' and 'for (i=0; i<n_basic_blocks; i++){}' Diego Novillo
19:44 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
19:35 Re: comparing DejaGNU results James Lemke
19:29 Re: Difference between 'FOR_EACH_BB' and 'for (i=0; i<n_basic_blocks; i++){}' sean yang
19:10 Re: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Ron McCall
18:55 Re: Difference between 'FOR_EACH_BB' and 'for (i=0; i<n_basic_blocks; i++){}' Steven Bosscher
18:51 Re: Difference between 'FOR_EACH_BB' and 'for (i=0; i<n_basic_blocks; i++){}' Diego Novillo
18:45 Re: Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Paul Brook
18:44 Difference between 'FOR_EACH_BB' and 'for (i=0; i<n_basic_blocks; i++){}' sean yang
18:42 Re: mingw32 subtle build failure Christopher Faylor
18:39 Re: Expansion of __builtin_frame_address Mark Shinwell
18:32 Intermixing powerpc-eabi and powerpc-linux C code Ron McCall
18:21 4.1.1 build failures due to old makeinfo Joe Buck
17:42 Assembler clarification jacob navia
17:27 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Mike Stump
14:18 Re: Modifying ARM code generator for elimination of 8bit writes - need help Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
13:27 Re: IA-64 speculation patches have bad impact on ARM Maxim Kuvyrkov
12:20 Re: hppa libiberty configure failure: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. Matthias Klose
12:12 hppa libiberty configure failure: Link tests are not allowed after GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES. Martin Michlmayr
11:55 Re: IA-64 speculation patches have bad impact on ARM Maxim Kuvyrkov
08:46 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Richard Earnshaw
06:29 Re: mingw32 subtle build failure Ranjit Mathew
03:25 Re: c++ regression in trunk Geoffrey Keating
03:10 Re: c++ regression in trunk Jack Howarth
02:43 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Mike Stump
02:17 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Mike Stump
01:48 Re: Segment registers support for i386 Ross Ridge
01:38 Re: Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI Joe Buck
01:29 Re: Problem about gcc 4.1 + binutil 2.16.92 + glibc 2.4 + ARM EABI Fengwei Yin
01:19 Re: c++ regression in trunk Jack Howarth
01:14 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Jim Wilson
00:59 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Andrew Pinski
00:56 Re: comparing DejaGNU results Ben Elliston
00:39 Re: c++ regression in trunk Geoffrey Keating
00:00 Re: c++ regression in trunk Jack Howarth

Indexes: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Site Nav: [Browse other archives for this mailing list]
[Browse other mailing lists at this site]
Search: Limit to:
Mail converted by MHonArc 2.6.3