This is the mail archive of the mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: IA-64 speculation patches have bad impact on ARM

Mark Mitchell wrote:

David Edelsohn wrote:

Maxim Kuvyrkov writes:

Maxim> Anyway, this work is for stage 1 or 2 and for now I propose following Maxim> fix: implement targetm.sched.reorder hook so that it will ensure that if Maxim> there is an insn from the current block in the ready list, then insn Maxim> from the other block won't stand first in the line (and, therefore, Maxim> won't be chosen for schedule). I feel that this will be what you are Maxim> calling 'filling holes'. Please find an example patch attached (arm.patch).

What about all of the other GCC targets?

If your patch changed the default behavior of the scheduler
assumed by all other ports, you should fix the scheduler and modify the
IA-64 port to get the behavior desired.


I think this is a serious regression, and I would like to consider our
options.  Daniel has suggested changing the default value of the
max-sched-extend-regions-iters param to 1.  However, I think we should
conservatively change it to zero, for now, and then use a target macro
to allow IA64 to set it to two, and other ports to gradually turn this
on if useful.

I am agree with this. Two months ago Maxim submitted patches which affects only ia64 except one thing affecting all targets - the patch which builds more scheduling regions and as consequence permits more aggressive interblock scheduling.

Insn scheduling before the register allocation even without Maxim's patches is not safe when hard registers are used in RTL. It is a known bug (e.g. for x86_64) and it is in bugzilla. Jim Wilson wrote several possible solutions for this, no one is easy to implement except for switching off insn scheduling before RA (what is done for x86_64).

But we can restore the state (probably safe for most programs) what was before Maxim's patch. So Maxim could you do this (of course you can save max-sched-extend-regions-iters value for ia64 because it is probably safe for targets with many registers).


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]