This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

address order and BB numbering


Although "BASIC_BLOCK array contains BBs in an unspecified order" as the GCC internal doc says, can I assume that the final virtual address for an instruction in BB_m is always higher than the virtual address for an instruction in BB_n, when m < n. (Let's assume the linker for the target machine produce code from low address to high address.)


It seems to be rigth to me. Just curious. Thanks,

_________________________________________________________________
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online computer virus scan from McAfee® Security. http://clinic.mcafee.com/clinic/ibuy/campaign.asp?cid=3963



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]