This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION

From: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
To: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 14:54:06 -0400
Subject: Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
References: <200605131402.18676.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <200605141458.25656.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <44676057.10407@dberlin.org> <200605142018.27127.ebotcazou@adacore.com>

Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Actually, the Fortran and objc people play nice too, and TBQH, i
>> wouldn't mind if we were only a C/C++/F95/Objc compiler.
> 
> Yeah, and I presume Objc is in the basket only because it's essentially C.
> F95 is a different case since it's a brand new compiler so it doesn't have to 
> bother about the legacy of a 10+ years old production compiler like GNAT.
> 

The real problem, as we all know, is that Adacore treats the GCC repo
like an extension of their corporate repo, instead of as the main tree.

The other languages don't do that.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Mike Stump

References:
- What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Eric Botcazou

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]