This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION

From: Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at adacore dot com>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Gabriel Dos Reis <gdr at integrable-solutions dot net>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Steven Bosscher <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, Per Bothner <per at bothner dot com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 20:18:26 +0200
Subject: Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
References: <200605131402.18676.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <200605141458.25656.ebotcazou@adacore.com> <44676057.10407@dberlin.org>

> Actually, the Fortran and objc people play nice too, and TBQH, i
> wouldn't mind if we were only a C/C++/F95/Objc compiler.

Yeah, and I presume Objc is in the basket only because it's essentially C.
F95 is a different case since it's a brand new compiler so it doesn't have to 
bother about the legacy of a 10+ years old production compiler like GNAT.

-- 
Eric Botcazou

Follow-Ups:
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Daniel Berlin
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Gabriel Dos Reis

References:
- What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Eric Botcazou
- Re: What to do with MAPPED_LOCATION
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]