This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class

From: Bernd Schmidt <bernds_cb1 at t-online dot de>
To: Ian Lance Taylor <ian at airs dot com>
Cc: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 10 May 2006 23:15:39 +0200
Subject: Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
References: <200605092221.k49MLFt3011364@greed.delorie.com> <m3psim7cr2.fsf@gossamer.airs.com> <200605101857.k4AIvq6k020603@greed.delorie.com> <m3psilmx4j.fsf@gossamer.airs.com>

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

You should run any patch past Joern, though.

I'd hesitate to apply patches to default_secondary_reload. If your port triggers any of the sanity checks, convert it to the new infrastructure, as it provides a much better interface.

Bernd

Follow-Ups:
- Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
  - From: DJ Delorie

References:
- default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: default_secondary_reload: class vs scratch_class
  - From: Ian Lance Taylor

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]