This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90

From: Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>
To: "François-Xavier Coudert" <fxcoudert at gmail dot com>
Cc: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>, GFortran <fortran at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc-patches <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "GCC Development" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Fri, 5 May 2006 08:08:59 -0700
Subject: Re: gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90
References: <19c433eb0605050405g5fb09403g50fb1af529ea5041@mail.gmail.com> <20060505123651.GA14569@lucon.org> <19c433eb0605050726k3d7f6e51gd059a2f4a47ec855@mail.gmail.com>

On May 5, 2006, at 7:26 AM, François-Xavier Coudert wrote:

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27437
Humpf. Does that mean that the patch wasn't regtested before being applied?

No, it was regression tested, just not on x86-linux-gnu like most people is doing.

-- Pinski

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert
- Re: gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: gfortran testsuite regression, gfortran.dg/entry_3.f90
  - From: François-Xavier Coudert

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]