This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Status of SEE and Autovectorization patches?
- From: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
- To: David Edelsohn <dje at watson dot ibm dot com>
- Cc: Mircea Namolaru <NAMOLARU at il dot ibm dot com>, Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, leehod at gmail dot com, Leehod Baruch <leehod dot baruch at weizmann dot ac dot il>, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Ayal Zaks <ZAKS at il dot ibm dot com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2006 08:37:35 -0700
- Subject: Re: Status of SEE and Autovectorization patches?
- References: <OFAA4248DD.C73F1798-ONC2257163.006C45B3-C2257163.006E7511@LocalDomain> <OF17ADCC43.09B7A466-ONC2257164.00487D78-42257164.00501904@il.ibm.com> <20060504144842.GA30457@lucon.org> <200605041515.k44FFR726090@makai.watson.ibm.com>
On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 11:15:27AM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I thought that you or others at Intel were going to extend the SEE
> infrastructure to better support x86. The x86 port can turn off SEE in
> override_options or XFAIL the tests for x86 until that work is committed.
Some of the issues aren't specific to x86. Has anyone tried
export BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" GCJFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" SYSROOT_CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O2 -fsee"
# ..../configure
# make BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" CXXFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" FCFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" GCJFLAGS="-g -O2 -fsee" SYSROOT_CFLAGS_FOR_TARGET="-g -O2 -fsee"
on PPC/PPC64?
H.J.