This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Summer of Code project discussion

From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow at false dot org>
To: Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>
Cc: Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas dot biveinis at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 3 May 2006 10:49:41 -0400
Subject: Re: Summer of Code project discussion
References: <d1e3ff2b0605021207j7524beddj@mail.gmail.com> <20060503012001.GA21720@nevyn.them.org> <1146620078.11943.14.camel@dberlin0-corp.corp.google.com>

On Tue, May 02, 2006 at 09:34:38PM -0400, Daniel Berlin wrote:
> My thoughts are along the lines of Daniel's.  I originally believed that
> the better data layout of lifetime and object specific pools would help,
> but it only helps about 10% in the extreme.

Oh, one of the more interesting results from my testing: it can
sometimes help much more than that - in precompiled header layout.
Depending on the phase of the moon, I saw PCH performance improvements
from 3% to 20%.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery

References:
- Summer of Code project discussion
  - From: Laurynas Biveinis
- Re: Summer of Code project discussion
  - From: Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: Summer of Code project discussion
  - From: Daniel Berlin

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]