This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: libstdc++ in a combined tree

DJ Delorie wrote:
>> I see -- but why did we set GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES?  Don't we only do that
>> when we've failed to link things?
> 
> No, it's explicit:

I apologize; I didn't realize that.  In that case, you're right; the
current approach is just busted.  It should become an --enable option,
or a hard-coded case statement, or an autoconf test that doesn't require
linking stuff.

In my ideal world, we wouldn't set GCC_NO_EXECUTABLES because we'd be
able to link by this point, but I guess it must be there to support
exactly the kind of environment you're in.

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713
Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]