This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: build_x_binary_op (ARRAY_REF ?!



make_node does memset, but the loop above is after the call to make_node.


I guess we didn't hit the problem just because tsubst_copy_and_build()
(where build_x_binary_op (ARRAY_REF is) is never called for array_ref when processing_template_decl is non zero.

Probably.
Unfortunately, TREE_OPERAND checks the static lookup table for how many operands the tree code is supposed to have, *not* how many operands were actually allocated to the thing.


My suggestion would be to simply add some gcc_asserts that we don't ever get ARRAY_REF there :)


I guess that sort of assertions need at least a comment or gcc_assert().


Alex.



Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]