This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC Compiler Engineer job (I am not a recruiter)

From: Mike Stump <mrs at apple dot com>
To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
Cc: "gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 12:51:03 -0700
Subject: Re: GCC Compiler Engineer job (I am not a recruiter)
References: <56401d900604071507o60c912b0pd44594a6de5fe4e6@mail.gmail.com> <443AA897.4030509@codesourcery.com>

On Apr 10, 2006, at 11:48 AM, Mark Mitchell wrote:

Thoughts?

We don't want to open the flood gates to random recruiters for random software, however, I never saw the harm in solicitations from gcc contributors for people to work on gcc. If we were to relax the current policy, we can have a policy of only write-after or better people can advertise. Also, the FSF will require that the job advertised be for free-software and free of non-free things (see http://www.fsf.org/jobs/). So, one cannot say, Word experience required, or wanted people to work on gcc and Visual Studio.

I think that maybe a section in the wiki might be an interesting compromise and allowing just a pointer to it on the list.

Back in the 97-99 timeframe I was the one asking, and I was directed to comp.compilers and the FSF's jobs site (http://www.fsf.org/ jobs/). I looked on the wayback machine, and couldn't narrow the date.

References:
- GCC Compiler Engineer job (I am not a recruiter)
  - From: Rick Edwards
- Re: GCC Compiler Engineer job (I am not a recruiter)
  - From: Mark Mitchell

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]