This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Incremental gcc

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Mike Stump" <mrs at apple dot com>
Cc: "Camm Maguire" <camm at enhanced dot com>, "GCC Mailing List" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>, "Robert Boyer" <boyer at cs dot utexas dot edu>, gcl-devel at gnu dot org, "Robert Dodier" <robert dot dodier at gmail dot com>
Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 00:27:53 +0200
Subject: Re: Incremental gcc
References: <200603181626.k2IGQO3E006491@elgin.cs.utexas.edu> <54psk9dbz5.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <F110F442-FE7D-493C-895E-84DBAD212818@apple.com> <54slp09bbu.fsf@intech19.enhanced.com> <B2BC987D-0695-417F-9128-0A0D7A2C41D7@apple.com>

On 3/31/06, Mike Stump <mrs@apple.com> wrote:
> On Mar 30, 2006, at 7:55 AM, Camm Maguire wrote:
> > This was the most promising.  If I could run gcc as a pipe with
> > assembler only output, all I need is a 'flush instruction on stdin
> > to get the assemly of the function(s) input thus far.
>
> I suspect we could add a fflush after each function...  I don't think
> we presently do.

This won't work gcc needs to see the whole compilation unit.

Richard.

References:
- Incremental gcc
  - From: Camm Maguire
- Re: Incremental gcc
  - From: Mike Stump
- Re: Incremental gcc
  - From: Camm Maguire
- Re: Incremental gcc
  - From: Mike Stump

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]