This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: the loss of SET_TYPE


On 25 Mar 2006 00:02:43 +0000, Gaius Mulley <gaius@glam.ac.uk> wrote:
> Pragmatically I guess it is best for me to maintain a reversed patch
> which can be applied to a gcc-4.1.0 tar ball which reintroduces this
> TYPE. Any thoughts?

I think it would be better if you make the SET_TYPE a front-end
specific tree node, much like e.g. the tcc_type tree codes in
cp/cp-tree.def.  Then you can use SET_TYPE in the front end, and
translate the set operations to valid GIMPLE later on when
gimplifying.

Gr.
Steven


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]