This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "Dan Kegel" <dank at kegel dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:26:19 +0100
Subject: Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
References: <a71bd89a0603130726y46ef7266i5d5aeb5a076007c9@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000603130813o3ca89bf7hd8ede89ddadc65a9@mail.gmail.com>

On 3/13/06, Richard Guenther <richard.guenther@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 3/13/06, Dan Kegel <dank@kegel.com> wrote:
> > Is there a bugzilla entry describing the bug Richard is fixing?
> > If not, it'd be nice to have, if for no other reason than
> > it would show up naturally when people look for bugs fixed in gcc-4.1.1.
> >
> > I can create one, but it'd be better if someone actually
> > involved in the action did.
>
> I can do it.

http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26667

Richard.

References:
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Dan Kegel
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Richard Guenther

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]