This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X

From: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>
To: "Ernest L. Williams Jr." <ernesto at ornl dot gov>
Cc: "Nickolay Kolchin" <nbkolchin at gmail dot com>, "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:14:09 +0100
Subject: Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
References: <2636500f0603112016u1e5990f8vbe8eecde35baa504@mail.gmail.com> <84fc9c000603120243u64a5c571na1e2286871173a67@mail.gmail.com> <2636500f0603120555h39336789tad3f7479053137d@mail.gmail.com> <1142172601.20144.3.camel@bengal>

> Yes, why is the benchmark not valid?

It is valid.  We should understand why this behavior has changed so drastically.

Gr.
Steven

Follow-Ups:
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Nickolay Kolchin
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: tbp

References:
- 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Nickolay Kolchin
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Nickolay Kolchin
- Re: 100x perfomance regression between gcc 3.4.5 and gcc 4.X
  - From: Ernest L. Williams Jr.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]