This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Bogus trees from Ada front-end (more VRP vs Ada) stuff)


On Wed, 2006-03-08 at 12:36 +0100, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Presumably there's a reason why enumeral types don't have a
> > base type?
> 
> They are viewed as full-blown types by Ada, forming the class of discrete 
> types with integral types, so there are probably no semantics reasons why 
> ENUMERAL_TYPE nodes should have an INTEGER_TYPE node as their base type.
OK


> I'm testing a pure fold-const.c patch based on Richard's suggestion.
Cool.  I was waiting to hear from y'all on the basetype question
before hacking up fold-const.c.  Looks like you're going to beat
me to the punch.   I'll be anxiously awaiting your patch :-)

jeff


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]