This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released

From: "Richard Guenther" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: "H. J. Lu" <hjl at lucon dot org>
Cc: "Steven Bosscher" <stevenb dot gcc at gmail dot com>, gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org, "Mark Mitchell" <mark at codesourcery dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 21:42:19 +0100
Subject: Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released
References: <200603011624.k21GOIcS031219@sethra.codesourcery.com> <20060301201457.GA20376@lucon.org> <200603012121.19716.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <20060301203955.GA20560@lucon.org>

On 3/1/06, H. J. Lu <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 01, 2006 at 09:21:19PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > On Wednesday 01 March 2006 21:14, H. J. Lu wrote:
> > > Is 4.1 branch open now? I'd like to back port the x86
> > > -mtune=generic patch:
> >
> > Isn't that totally inappropriate for a release branch?
> >
>
> What is it inappropriate about?

It's a new feature and not a fix for a regression.  -> totally inappropriate.

Richard.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released
  - From: H. J. Lu

References:
- GCC 4.1.0 Released
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released
  - From: H. J. Lu
- Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: GCC 4.1.0 Released
  - From: H. J. Lu

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]