This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Inconsistency in ix86_binary_operator_ok?

From: rridge at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca (Ross Ridge)
To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:21:02 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in ix86_binary_operator_ok?

>My confusion is that these functions currently allow arithmetic
>operations of the form "reg = op(mem,immed)" even though this
>shape isn't supported by x86 ISA.

The IMUL instruction can have this form.

					Ross Ridge

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]