This is the mail archive of the
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Inconsistency in ix86_binary_operator_ok?
- From: rridge at csclub dot uwaterloo dot ca (Ross Ridge)
- To: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
- Date: Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:21:02 -0500 (EST)
- Subject: Re: Inconsistency in ix86_binary_operator_ok?
>My confusion is that these functions currently allow arithmetic
>operations of the form "reg = op(mem,immed)" even though this
>shape isn't supported by x86 ISA.
The IMUL instruction can have this form.