This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: Inconsistency in ix86_binary_operator_ok?


>My confusion is that these functions currently allow arithmetic
>operations of the form "reg = op(mem,immed)" even though this
>shape isn't supported by x86 ISA.

The IMUL instruction can have this form.

					Ross Ridge


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]