This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: static inline function body is missing

From: Jim Wilson <wilson at specifix dot com>
To: Nemanja Popov <nemanja dot popov at micronasnit dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:14:04 -0800
Subject: Re: static inline function body is missing
References: <e538aa3e0602210219j412b3f8fn52f96f2fff117bfe@mail.gmail.com> <43FB1B13.2050004@lu.unisi.ch> <e538aa3e0602232047k513ca6f7w3ed4eb9f92062493@mail.gmail.com> <43FEB75A.3010904@lu.unisi.ch> <09c901c6392a$35cced30$b200a8c0@niit.micronasnit.com>

Nemanja Popov wrote:

dlx-elf-gcc -S foo.c -funit-at-a-time

Mike's suggestions are good in general, but there is another thing you should be looking at. Since you are explicitly asking for -funit-at-a-time, I would suggest looking in cgraph. cgraph has code to optimize away unused static functions. You may be confusing cgraph somehow. Take a look at cgraph_mark_needed_node and decide_is_function_needed. -- Jim Wilson, GNU Tools Support, http://www.specifix.com

References:
- do -fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities help to set bb->count?
  - From: Liu Haibin
- Re: do -fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities help to set bb->count?
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- Re: do -fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities help to set bb->count?
  - From: Liu Haibin
- Re: do -fprofile-arcs and -fbranch-probabilities help to set bb->count?
  - From: Paolo Bonzini
- static inline function body is missing
  - From: Nemanja Popov

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]