This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: pointer member constant expression

From: Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>
To: Dave Korn <dave dot korn at artimi dot com>
Cc: "'Perry Smith'" <pedz at easesoftware dot net>, "'Richard Guenther'" <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, "'GCC Mailing List'" <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:35:38 -0800
Subject: Re: pointer member constant expression
References: <7109A701-3A67-46A0-9FAB-17768F4E6422@easesoftware.net> <01a701c63b95$6f4226d0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>

On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:00:42PM -0000, Dave Korn wrote:
>   It has been illegal to initialise a static class member inside the class
> definition since sometime back in the early 90s.  You must provide a static
> instantiation elsewhere and initialise that.

g++ used to allow in-class-definition initializations that the standard
does not; some of these have either bit-rotted or been removed over time.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: pointer member constant expression
  - From: Perry Smith

References:
- Re: pointer member constant expression
  - From: Perry Smith
- RE: pointer member constant expression
  - From: Dave Korn

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]