This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: gcc 4.1 regression for adjusted function declaration?
Andrew Pinski wrote:
GCC before 4.0.0 was incorrect at not rejecting this code.
See PR 19333.
Use -pedantic with 3.2.3 and you will get a warning.
Yes, I do, but it is also questionable if this warning is required or
even useful.
Also see:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-01/msg00948.html
The issue there is completely different. The array has definetly no
completed type.
In the testcase I have given - which is pruned down from the pthread.h
header file on
a linux installation - after applying adjustment, you get:
extern void f (struct tag *a);
which is fine. So this is only about the technicality if the adjustment
is actually
defined in this case. It appears to me that the intent of the standard
was that this
should be defined, while the letter of it is not even self-consistet.