This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 4.0.1 and GCC 4.1.0 20060210 on MICO 2.3.12 sources
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Karel Gardas <kgardas at objectsecurity dot com>
- Cc: GCC Mailing List <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:41:34 +0100
- Subject: Re: Compilation performance comparison of GCC 4.0.1 and GCC 4.1.0 20060210 on MICO 2.3.12 sources
- References: <Pine.LNX.4.63.0602112112420.15063@silence.gardas.net>
On 2/11/06, Karel Gardas <kgardas@objectsecurity.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it's been a while since my last comparison of various GCC's compilation
> performance on MICO sources. A lot happened in GCC development since
> then and so I'm here with more up-to-date measurements. This time I've
> used MICO 2.3.12 release sources and again measured time of
> compilation of orb subdirectory files. I've compared my GCC 4.0.1
> release with GCC 4.1.0 20060210 prerelease on AMD64 generating code
> for this platform. Whole tables are below, but overall results are,
> that 4.1.0 is slower on all compilations (sums) while using
> -O0/1/2/3/s optimization levels, actual numbers are:
Apart from compile-time, is there a runtime benchmarking suite for MICO
(or is runtime generally not that interesting here)? Or numbers on object
size, if runtime is not that important. Just to get an idea if there
is anything
we get back from the increased compile times.
Thanks,
Richard.