This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-02-14)
- From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:10:06 +0100
- Subject: Re: GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-02-14)
- References: <43F1A355.6020307@codesourcery.com>
On 2/14/06, Mark Mitchell <mark@codesourcery.com> wrote:
> In the last few days, many of the key obstacles to a 4.1 release were
> removed, including, but not limited to:
>
> 1) The -mlong-double-128 patches have gone in.
> 2) Jason fixed some RVO issues.
> 3) Michael fixed the zero-width bitfield vs. #pragma pack issue.
>
> Unfortunately, there are still two PRs for regressions that I think
> merit P1:
>
> PR26258: wrong code caused by incorrect alias analyis.
This is now fixed on both the branch and the mainline.
> PR26209: an ICE-on-valid for simple C++ code, from Boost, using a
> pointer-to-member.
>
> We could argue about PR26209, but I thin PR26258 is too embarrassing to
> have in a release. Fortunately, a patch has been posted for PR26258,
> and Richard G. claims to have a patch for PR26209.
I guess you meant 26258, the patch for 26029 is by Zdenek and still
lacks a review:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-02/msg00933.html
Richard.