This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RTL alias analysis

From: Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Steven Bosscher <steven at gcc dot gnu dot org>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:24:43 +0100
Subject: Re: RTL alias analysis
References: <200512292242.17272.stevenb@suse.de> <43D11C2E.2020202@codesourcery.com> <200601201834.10881.steven.bosscher@gmail.com> <200601201839.21641.steven@gcc.gnu.org> <20060120210319.GA26696@redhat.com>

On 1/20/06, Richard Henderson <rth@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 20, 2006 at 06:39:21PM +0100, Steven Bosscher wrote:
> > FWIW, I don't believe this is a "fix", but rather a solid work-around
> > for the problem.  I'm still trusting rth's superior compiler brain and
> > GCC knowledge to ultimately be ingredients in a real fix ;-)
>
> I don't think it's quite solid for a workaround.

Can you base this thought on a testcase?  Not that I'm confident
of the workaround - I'm just sure it's a progression from what we have now.

Richard.

References:
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]