This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: RTL alias analysis

From: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
To: Steven Bosscher <steven dot bosscher at gmail dot com>
Cc: gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org, Richard Guenther <richard dot guenther at gmail dot com>, Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>, Daniel Berlin <dberlin at dberlin dot org>, Jan Hubicka <jh at suse dot cz>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 09:38:40 -0800
Subject: Re: RTL alias analysis
References: <200512292242.17272.stevenb@suse.de> <84fc9c000601200149o7b5446c8r7d3497094d7cf86d@mail.gmail.com> <43D11C2E.2020202@codesourcery.com> <200601201834.10881.steven.bosscher@gmail.com>

Steven Bosscher wrote:
> On Friday 20 January 2006 18:21, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> 
>>Richard Guenther wrote:
>>
>>>A patch was also posted based on ideas in the audit trail.  It's third
>>>incarnation at
>>>http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2006-01/msg00967.html
>>>would need a review.
>>
>>This patch uses "type_i == type_j" which is usually a mistake; are we
>>sure we don't need the usual type-equality predicate functions?
>  
> Ah, you noticed that.  So you answered your own question:

If so, I'm not smart enough to understand the answer.  Clearly, the
comments on the patch are insufficient for me to understand what it's
doing.  May we please have a version of the patch which a paragraph
explaining what the tests are accomplishing?

-- 
Mark Mitchell
CodeSourcery
mark@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x713

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher

References:
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Richard Guenther
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Mark Mitchell
- Re: RTL alias analysis
  - From: Steven Bosscher

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]