Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap

[Joe Buck <Joe dot Buck at synopsys dot COM>]

On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:44:37AM -0600, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org> writes:
> 
> | On Wed, Jan 18, 2006 at 08:36:13AM -0500, Richard Kenner wrote:
> | >     MRS and Eric Botcazou objected strongly against not being able to
> | >     build a 1-stage GCC with --disable-bootstrap.  And that's never going
> | >     to happen.
> | > 
> | > One would hope that wouldn't, but what I heard was an objection
> | > against removing what's there now, namely the capability to bootstrap
> | > GCC and *just* GCC.  In other words, to have a mode when you can do a
> | > bootstrap that does no more work than the present one does.
> | 
> | I don't believe anyone has said that except for you.
> 
> Indeed.  And I would not count repeated mails from Richard Kenner as
> *lot of people*, no matter how many times he sent the message :-)

Given that each mail from Richard starts a new thread, sometimes it looks
that way.  Richard, *please* use a proper mail program.  Any thread you
participate in is painful to follow.