This is the mail archive of the
gcc@gcc.gnu.org
mailing list for the GCC project.
Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15)
- From: Laurent GUERBY <laurent at guerby dot net>
- To: Mark Mitchell <mark at codesourcery dot com>
- Cc: doko at debian dot org, John David Anglin <dave at hiauly1 dot hia dot nrc dot ca>, Ulrich Weigand <uweigand at de dot ibm dot com>, Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>, Andreas Schwab <schwab at suse dot de>, Eric Botcazou <ebotcazou at libertysurf dot fr>, Richard Kenner <kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu>, gcc mailing list <gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org>
- Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:38:04 +0100
- Subject: Re: [Ada] GCC 4.1 Status Report (2006-01-15)
- References: <43CB0BD0.4080707@codesourcery.com>
On the Ada side for 4.1:
- x86-linux is fine, 0 ACATS FAIL on i686 and i486
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00632.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00148.html
- powerpc-darwin doesn't bootstrap => PR 22533, regression from 4.0),
Richard, Eric, Andrew, do you have a status for powerpc-darwin on 4.1?
- three ACATS wrong-code on amd64-linux => PR 20548, regression from 4.0
but it looks like we were lucky before so might not count as a
regression. Note this one affects some other platforms too and some
don't see those FAIL at all on amd64:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00834.html
On other platforms:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00830.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00633.html
powerpc-linux is in good shape.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00833.html
hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 has some cxg problems, but I don't
know if 4.0 worked at all there.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00816.html
ia64-linux looks fine (Andreas, could you send me the compressed log,
c36204d FAIL is not filed in bugzilla yet).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00631.html
s390-ibm-linux-gnu is in good shape (ce3810b is PR 20753 and is also
present on other platforms)
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00663.html
s390x-ibm-linux-gnu (Ulrich, cdd2a01 is unfiled, could you send
me the compressed log).
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00606.html
hppa-linux is in good shape.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2006-01/msg00635.html
sparc-linux is in good shape.
No 4.1 test result for alpha-linux in january, even for C which has only
4.0 and 4.2 test results. Is there a build problem on this platform?
Laurent
On Sun, 2006-01-15 at 18:58 -0800, Mark Mitchell wrote:
> The release of GCC 4.1 was scheduled for January 18th. Given the fact
> that I've not yet built release candidates, that date is not achievable.
>
> We have 63 regressions open against GCC 4.1, but only six are P1. Since
> P1s are showstoppers, that means we're not yet ready to start building
> release candidates -- but we're close. (I'm presently testing a fix for
> one of the PR22136, which is one of the P1 problems.)
>
> In any case, once the P1s are resolved, the branch will be frozen and I
> will create the GCC 4.1.0 RC1. Then, all going well, we'll have GCC
> 4.1.0 within about a week of RC1; if there are problems reported for
> RC1, then we'll iterate.
>
> Therefore, if there are other regressions which you would like to see
> fixed for 4.1, now is the time!
>