This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)

From: Marcin Dalecki <martin at dalecki dot de>
To: DJ Delorie <dj at redhat dot com>
Cc: kenner at vlsi1 dot ultra dot nyu dot edu, paul at codesourcery dot com, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:28:01 +0100
Subject: Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)
References: <10601161743.AA12121@vlsi1.ultra.nyu.edu> <200601161818.k0GII1BF031801@greed.delorie.com>

On 2006-01-16, at 19:18, DJ Delorie wrote:


A cross compiler and a native compiler targeting the same CPU chip,
that's a different story.

No it isn't. The results should still be the same.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)
  - From: Joe Buck

References:
- Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)
  - From: Richard Kenner
- Re: Status and rationale for toplevel bootstrap (was Re: Example of debugging GCC with toplevel bootstrap)
  - From: DJ Delorie

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]