This is the mail archive of the gcc@gcc.gnu.org mailing list for the GCC project.

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here?

From: Diego Novillo <dnovillo at redhat dot com>
To: Richard Henderson <rth at redhat dot com>
Cc: Roger Sayle <roger at eyesopen dot com>, gcc at gcc dot gnu dot org
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:09:03 -0500
Subject: Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here?
References: <200601121323.47985.dnovillo@redhat.com> <200601121457.51605.dnovillo@redhat.com> <20060112200144.GA21843@redhat.com>

On Thursday 12 January 2006 15:01, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 12, 2006 at 02:57:51PM -0500, Diego Novillo wrote:
> > Sounds good to me, but maybe the Fortran FE is relying on the
> > recursive nature of fold() to handle things like 'A = 1 + 1'?
>
> Huh?  Fold isn't recursive in that way.  By design.
>
Silly me.  Even better then.

References:
- Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here?
  - From: Diego Novillo
- Re: Is fold_binary_expr being too picky here?
  - From: Richard Henderson

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]