Re: Devirtualizing method calls

[Andrew Pinski <pinskia at physics dot uc dot edu>]

On Jan 5, 2006, at 8:09 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:

> I've been experimenting with devirtualizing method calls, and
> sometimes a construct like this can pay dividends:

> Another possibility is to have the inliner convert virtual calls into
> something like the above.  Maybe the real solution to all of is is to
> have a representation for virtual calls in the IL, but...
>
> So, what I'm thinking of doing is writing a post-inlining pass that
> rewrites the trees and then tidies up the CFG.  Is this the right
> approach?

Just for the record, there are already two other people implementing
something like already:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-12/msg00487.html
and
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2005-10/msg01563.html

-- Pinski